Re: [dhcwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-duid-uuid-02.txt

Tom Taylor <tom111.taylor@bell.net> Thu, 06 January 2011 18:38 UTC

Return-Path: <tom111.taylor@bell.net>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EEB63A6F3A for <dhcwg@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Jan 2011 10:38:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.765
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.765 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.031, BAYES_00=-2.599, MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER=0.803, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vmy+T8KXSyHR for <dhcwg@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Jan 2011 10:38:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from blu0-omc1-s13.blu0.hotmail.com (blu0-omc1-s13.blu0.hotmail.com [65.55.116.24]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B54BD3A6F3D for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 6 Jan 2011 10:38:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from BLU0-SMTP35 ([65.55.116.7]) by blu0-omc1-s13.blu0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Thu, 6 Jan 2011 10:40:52 -0800
X-Originating-IP: [70.26.23.173]
X-Originating-Email: [tom111.taylor@bell.net]
Message-ID: <BLU0-SMTP35250C24F679C33D61FC3ED80A0@phx.gbl>
Received: from [192.168.2.17] ([70.26.23.173]) by BLU0-SMTP35.blu0.hotmail.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Thu, 6 Jan 2011 10:40:52 -0800
Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2011 13:40:55 -0500
From: Tom Taylor <tom111.taylor@bell.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Thunderbird/3.1.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Thomas Narten <narten@us.ibm.com>
References: <36A80113-2DF3-4D81-8490-D0FD91DFD2F9@nominum.com> <201101061439.p06Edgwg022576@cichlid.raleigh.ibm.com>
In-Reply-To: <201101061439.p06Edgwg022576@cichlid.raleigh.ibm.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 06 Jan 2011 18:40:52.0289 (UTC) FILETIME=[3EC26B10:01CBADD1]
Cc: "dhcwg@ietf.org WG" <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-duid-uuid-02.txt
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2011 18:38:46 -0000

I support advancing this draft.

On 06/01/2011 9:39 AM, Thomas Narten wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> Now that the holiday break is over, some reviews of this document
> would be appreciated. The WG won't advance it if there is only
> silence...
>
> It's a short document. Only about 3 pages of substance.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Thomas
>
> Ted Lemon<Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>  writes:
>
>> We've been asked to do a last call on this draft; the authors
>> believe that it's ready, and at least one reviewer believes so too.
>> Please take this opportunity to review the draft if you have not
>> already done so.  If you find problems, please discuss them here on
>> the mailing list.  If you favor advancing the draft, please say so.
>> If you do not want the draft to advance, please say so.  If we hear
>> nothing but dead silence, the draft will not advance.
>
>> I will be offline from 12/30/10 to 1/10/10, so I will make some
>> determination as to the consensus on this draft when I get back
>> online on the 10th.
>
>> Thanks!
>
>> _______________________________________________
>> dhcwg mailing list
>> dhcwg@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg
> _______________________________________________
> dhcwg mailing list
> dhcwg@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg
>
>