[dhcwg] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6603 (3332)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Sat, 01 September 2012 12:13 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D62021F8565 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 1 Sep 2012 05:13:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.296
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.296 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.304, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rOONubp8ZGvw for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 1 Sep 2012 05:13:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [IPv6:2001:1890:123a::1:2f]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36B5C21F853B for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Sat, 1 Sep 2012 05:13:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 9372CB1E002; Sat, 1 Sep 2012 05:11:10 -0700 (PDT)
To: jouni.nospam@gmail.com, teemu.savolainen@nokia.com, suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com, ot@cisco.com, rdroms.ietf@gmail.com, brian@innovationslab.net, ted.lemon@nominum.com, john_brzozowski@cable.comcast.com
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <20120901121110.9372CB1E002@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Sat, 01 Sep 2012 05:11:10 -0700
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 01 Sep 2012 09:00:58 -0700
Cc: dhcwg@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Subject: [dhcwg] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6603 (3332)
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Sep 2012 12:13:41 -0000
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6603, "Prefix Exclude Option for DHCPv6-based Prefix Delegation". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6603&eid=3332 -------------------------------------- Type: Editorial Reported by: Gaurav Halwasia <ghalwasi@cisco.com> Section: 4.2 Original Text ------------- Any prefix excluded from the delegated prefix MUST be contained in OPTION_PD_EXCLUDE options within the corresponding OPTION_IAPREFIX. Corrected Text -------------- Any prefix excluded from the delegated prefix MUST be contained in OPTION_PD_EXCLUDE option within the corresponding OPTION_IAPREFIX. Notes ----- As per this specification OPTION_PD_EXCLUDE option is used to exclude exactly one prefix from a delegated prefix. So as per this specification only one instance of OPTION_PD_EXCLUDE option can be present within OPTION_IAPREFIX. Instructions: ------------- This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC6603 (draft-ietf-dhc-pd-exclude-04) -------------------------------------- Title : Prefix Exclude Option for DHCPv6-based Prefix Delegation Publication Date : May 2012 Author(s) : J. Korhonen, Ed., T. Savolainen, S. Krishnan, O. Troan Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Dynamic Host Configuration Area : Internet Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG