Re: [dhcwg] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6603 (3332)

Jouni <jouni.nospam@gmail.com> Sun, 02 September 2012 12:03 UTC

Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1278)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Jouni <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20120901121110.9372CB1E002@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Sun, 02 Sep 2012 15:03:46 +0300
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <95AA3CFE-8839-4283-9B57-E9B05A31F5E4@gmail.com>
References: <20120901121110.9372CB1E002@rfc-editor.org>
To: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: ot@cisco.com, brian@innovationslab.net, rdroms.ietf@gmail.com, dhcwg@ietf.org, ted.lemon@nominum.com
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6603 (3332)
Precedence: list

The errata is correct and should be accepted. In section 4.1 it is
specifically stated that "There can be at most one OPTION_PD_EXCLUDE
option in one OPTION_IAPREFIX option."

- Jouni


On Sep 1, 2012, at 3:11 PM, RFC Errata System wrote:

> 
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6603,
> "Prefix Exclude Option for DHCPv6-based Prefix Delegation".
> 
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6603&eid=3332
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Editorial
> Reported by: Gaurav Halwasia <ghalwasi@cisco.com>
> 
> Section: 4.2
> 
> Original Text
> -------------
>   Any prefix excluded from the delegated prefix MUST be contained in
>   OPTION_PD_EXCLUDE options within the corresponding OPTION_IAPREFIX.
> 
> Corrected Text
> --------------
>   Any prefix excluded from the delegated prefix MUST be contained in
>   OPTION_PD_EXCLUDE option within the corresponding OPTION_IAPREFIX.
> 
> Notes
> -----
> As per this specification OPTION_PD_EXCLUDE option is used to exclude exactly one prefix from a delegated prefix. So as per this specification only one instance of OPTION_PD_EXCLUDE option can be present within OPTION_IAPREFIX.
> 
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 
> 
> --------------------------------------
> RFC6603 (draft-ietf-dhc-pd-exclude-04)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : Prefix Exclude Option for DHCPv6-based Prefix Delegation
> Publication Date    : May 2012
> Author(s)           : J. Korhonen, Ed., T. Savolainen, S. Krishnan, O. Troan
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : Dynamic Host Configuration
> Area                : Internet
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG

[dhcwg] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6603 (3332) RFC Errata System
Re: [dhcwg] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6603 (… Jouni
Re: [dhcwg] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6603 (… Brian Haberman
Re: [dhcwg] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6603 (… Jouni