Re: [dhcwg] Prefix length option for Dhcpv6
sthaug@nethelp.no Tue, 01 March 2011 17:18 UTC
Return-Path: <sthaug@nethelp.no>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3DE73A6992 for <dhcwg@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Mar 2011 09:18:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GNwz3wfM+x79 for <dhcwg@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Mar 2011 09:18:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from bizet.nethelp.no (bizet.nethelp.no [195.1.209.33]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 2C7F33A6A2F for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 1 Mar 2011 09:18:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 90658 invoked from network); 1 Mar 2011 17:19:29 -0000
Received: from bizet.nethelp.no (HELO localhost) (195.1.209.33) by bizet.nethelp.no with SMTP; 1 Mar 2011 17:19:29 -0000
Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2011 18:19:29 +0100
Message-Id: <20110301.181929.74671719.sthaug@nethelp.no>
To: suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com
From: sthaug@nethelp.no
In-Reply-To: <4FD1E7CD248BF84F86BD4814EDDDBCC150EBF2F94A@EUSAACMS0703.eamcs.ericsson.se>
References: <AANLkTi=X9RynmHVzfjDwdYhHPJs5Hov8gGGu9d8MNFeA@mail.gmail.com> <4FD1E7CD248BF84F86BD4814EDDDBCC150EBF2F94A@EUSAACMS0703.eamcs.ericsson.se>
X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: dhcwg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] Prefix length option for Dhcpv6
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2011 17:18:34 -0000
> This concern has been raised before and was the base for this draft. > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-droms-dhc-dhcpv6-default-router-00 However, this draft is expired, and is presumably going nowhere. Meanwhile, people are *still* asking for it. The demand is not going to disappear. Personally, I can live with DHCPv6 IA_PD and link-local addresses on the link between CPE and BRAS, and default gateway supplied by RA. But I don't have to like it. I would turn off RA completely if I could. Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug@nethelp.no
- [dhcwg] Prefix length option for Dhcpv6 ravi kumar
- Re: [dhcwg] Prefix length option for Dhcpv6 Suresh Krishnan
- Re: [dhcwg] Prefix length option for Dhcpv6 sthaug
- Re: [dhcwg] Prefix length option for Dhcpv6 Mark Smith
- Re: [dhcwg] Prefix length option for Dhcpv6 Tomasz Mrugalski
- Re: [dhcwg] Prefix length option for Dhcpv6 Mark Smith