IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dhcwg] Prefix length option for Dhcpv6

Mark Smith <dhc@ietf-dhc-6761.nosense.org> Tue, 01 March 2011 21:12 UTC

Return-Path: <dhc@ietf-dhc-6761.nosense.org>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37BA33A6AC6 for <dhcwg@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Mar 2011 13:12:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.895
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.895 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_AU=0.377, HOST_EQ_AU=0.327]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Z72COKbkNYgo for <dhcwg@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Mar 2011 13:12:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp1.adam.net.au (smtp1.adam.net.au [202.136.110.253]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE4B53A6AB8 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 1 Mar 2011 13:12:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 114-30-108-110.ip.adam.com.au ([114.30.108.110] helo=opy.nosense.org) by smtp1.adam.net.au with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <dhc@ietf-dhc-6761.nosense.org>) id 1PuWsR-0000Ue-M7; Wed, 02 Mar 2011 07:43:03 +1030
Received: from opy.nosense.org (localhost.localdomain [IPv6:::1]) by opy.nosense.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1695A5355A; Wed, 2 Mar 2011 07:43:03 +1030 (CST)
Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2011 07:43:02 +1030
From: Mark Smith <dhc@ietf-dhc-6761.nosense.org>
To: sthaug@nethelp.no
Message-ID: <20110302074302.1f16f769@opy.nosense.org>
In-Reply-To: <20110301.181929.74671719.sthaug@nethelp.no>
References: <AANLkTi=X9RynmHVzfjDwdYhHPJs5Hov8gGGu9d8MNFeA@mail.gmail.com> <4FD1E7CD248BF84F86BD4814EDDDBCC150EBF2F94A@EUSAACMS0703.eamcs.ericsson.se> <20110301.181929.74671719.sthaug@nethelp.no>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.8 (GTK+ 2.22.1; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: dhcwg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] Prefix length option for Dhcpv6
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2011 21:12:04 -0000

On Tue, 01 Mar 2011 18:19:29 +0100 (CET)
sthaug@nethelp.no wrote:

> >   This concern has been raised before and was the base for this draft.
> > 
> > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-droms-dhc-dhcpv6-default-router-00
> 
> However, this draft is expired, and is presumably going nowhere.
> Meanwhile, people are *still* asking for it. The demand is not going
> to disappear.
> 
> Personally, I can live with DHCPv6 IA_PD and link-local addresses on
> the link between CPE and BRAS, and default gateway supplied by RA. But
> I don't have to like it. I would turn off RA completely if I could.
> 

How would you express your addressing model choice to the
CPEs if you were able to switched off RAs?

> Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug@nethelp.no
> _______________________________________________
> dhcwg mailing list
> dhcwg@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email