IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dhcwg] Some comments regarding draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-unknown-msg-01

Cong Liu <gnocuil@gmail.com> Mon, 29 July 2013 07:48 UTC

Return-Path: <gnocuil@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9D8121F9956 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Jul 2013 00:48:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 46n4O+OeoLm2 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Jul 2013 00:48:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wg0-x232.google.com (mail-wg0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::232]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A3DD21F9970 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Jul 2013 00:48:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wg0-f50.google.com with SMTP id m15so4619027wgh.29 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Jul 2013 00:48:37 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=W2pkx2hlD33bQhvntNfJhtM/o76iZCyGxQ6ls/VvYyw=; b=jQNnY8uMS18EFMiuVCJcUwZKJTGG1eitAkojBm0T2Jv8SKiZLk9rwbgdXNTxJ8GBus M7T6LEfI5pFVahppQyv4y2FiSeQPO6fAISFIeLF83UKABec5W90TLxIGxO2ibpKmAekS doSsAqd5dPpbIUbbvoWnUZqvtVaQD/WmlfZ8dvoTRl7IKTe137fCy5f8u9FY8Ox4E4oi h99pk3wSlBtluiXjYRMhic0F4ZpJpPa1ValzCU8UthAui70U/tHdf8TjjTyxCqzYVvop W5CrCou59hTC6OJGFyRir9PRKNRkeQJgXPlmb1dNGAWf2d185OiEfv2EMmQd6HWrgQOa zBWw==
X-Received: by 10.194.2.13 with SMTP id 13mr42860225wjq.74.1375084117384; Mon, 29 Jul 2013 00:48:37 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.194.10.67 with HTTP; Mon, 29 Jul 2013 00:48:17 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <8D23D4052ABE7A4490E77B1A012B63077523396E@mbx-01.win.nominum.com>
References: <CAFGoqUPOVNOknZFD7JkhOSDqu63VML6iH7yyuA-je-_8W=G2bQ@mail.gmail.com> <8D23D4052ABE7A4490E77B1A012B6307752334C7@mbx-01.win.nominum.com> <CAFGoqUMLgyVFnhbF7LYhaiFm8HZt3H4T=Oj_014g_U0LcZBD0A@mail.gmail.com> <8D23D4052ABE7A4490E77B1A012B63077523396E@mbx-01.win.nominum.com>
From: Cong Liu <gnocuil@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 15:48:17 +0800
Message-ID: <CAF+sHxHQzA5bZe6uJ8_7Eha48O+UVOZHzvBmhb1tnDNdMvou_A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7b3a87565a650a04e2a1b847"
Cc: "<dhcwg@ietf.org>" <dhcwg@ietf.org>, "<cuiyong@tsinghua.edu.cn>" <cuiyong@tsinghua.edu.cn>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] Some comments regarding draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-unknown-msg-01
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 07:48:39 -0000

Hi Ted,

This relay-reply message is not a response to relay's message.

Cong

2013/7/29 Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>

> On Jul 29, 2013, at 9:05 AM, Marcin Siodelski <msiodelski@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > According to RFC3315, server may use Relay-Reply message if it can't
> send Reconfigure directly to the client:
>
> Right.   That's a relay-reply message, not a reconfigure message.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> dhcwg mailing list
> dhcwg@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email