IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dhcwg] WGLC on draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-solmaxrt-update-01 - respond by July 4

Tomek Mrugalski <tomasz.mrugalski@gmail.com> Mon, 15 July 2013 12:44 UTC

Return-Path: <tomasz.mrugalski@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92DFB21F9E88 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Jul 2013 05:44:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.378
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.378 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.221, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LQk7aTH-BgP5 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Jul 2013 05:44:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-bk0-x22f.google.com (mail-bk0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4008:c01::22f]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2DA421F9FC9 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Jul 2013 05:44:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-bk0-f47.google.com with SMTP id jg1so4556561bkc.34 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Jul 2013 05:44:36 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:x-tagtoolbar-keys :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=5n6Rbi8JxdU22EA4W/SITDK7P0P27/4ZCLmrr2fq/bE=; b=X2F1lx4VxX15x1eo4tPC5QhNbw41J9HpQ5u+VHC+Dl9Lo8xqsCgS+LsFdbyGhkurhN lsbjlgfNkzhpLaiqRUcW0itsTtZNUfaGg5h1uFeqQJ97z4EOiWQBNqyT0MyJSVF/aDTT +GiyUPszqVV33bIP4hjZY8CfYAB8FfXfom8t/yDKnLO3/gYuXQAi1y8iv1Eg2jGgfjm9 Oc69bA1Pz53QFx05fkYuI0rCJRiKhkEJ6kLb3QJjL1YfwARsNx4WFSifQbnseERYB9XW 3euYE6AWQLMxTxbWn5RDVnjjN7XY3WjLDShztqQmXmvLzVcsQo4wHSH23yxKqYkrSmTq qaVg==
X-Received: by 10.205.9.8 with SMTP id ou8mr7992514bkb.76.1373892276724; Mon, 15 Jul 2013 05:44:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.0.100] (host-109-107-11-157.ip.jarsat.pl. [109.107.11.157]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id g5sm4337842bkh.17.2013.07.15.05.44.34 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 15 Jul 2013 05:44:35 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <51E3EEAC.9050304@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2013 14:44:28 +0200
From: Tomek Mrugalski <tomasz.mrugalski@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130623 Thunderbird/17.0.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>, "dhcwg@ietf.org WG" <dhcwg@ietf.org>
References: <BD87928F6BFAEF4EBEB883E1C4F587723B904200@PACDCEXMB01.cable.comcast.com> <79A85A7E-350C-4528-922D-485F92E2E537@gmail.com> <489D13FBFA9B3E41812EA89F188F018E185DE1E8@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com> <51DFE245.6080909@gmail.com> <8D23D4052ABE7A4490E77B1A012B63077520F98F@mbx-01.win.nominum.com>
In-Reply-To: <8D23D4052ABE7A4490E77B1A012B63077520F98F@mbx-01.win.nominum.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6
X-TagToolbar-Keys: D20130715144428551
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com>, Ralph Droms <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] WGLC on draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-solmaxrt-update-01 - respond by July 4
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2013 12:44:39 -0000

On 14.07.2013 17:51, Ted Lemon wrote:
> If there is strong desire in the working group to change the name, we
> can do that.   It would require a draft that updates all the specs
> that use that name, including the BOOTP specs.   It might be worth
> doing; if you think it is, feel free to make it happen.
I doubt there's a strong need to do that. It's just an aesthetic detail.

I suppose that's another thing to do as part of the 3315bis work.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email