IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dhcwg] WGLC on draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-solmaxrt-update-01 - respond by July 4

Tomek Mrugalski <tomasz.mrugalski@gmail.com> Tue, 09 July 2013 21:25 UTC

Return-Path: <tomasz.mrugalski@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A897E21F8BE6 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Jul 2013 14:25:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.212
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.212 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.388, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YFhtvNDhGq7C for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Jul 2013 14:25:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-bk0-x234.google.com (mail-bk0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4008:c01::234]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DAD721F881F for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Jul 2013 14:25:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-bk0-f52.google.com with SMTP id d7so2565166bkh.25 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 09 Jul 2013 14:25:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=EX8AQfu1KjAmpZKMMudVwfsoYEQW1ZwoEVSNM0uwAI8=; b=dVFRQO0MgW+FTYFo1MqTAso+d0u6wAQNFagOOb2bWkvg021axO61WJ8JEsvWmYQrtL cfMSsFEY976WHxCy5HknpHOZNWzrYz2HtGjcOCc85lE+age9CSRiskVqysQL5/vOzEyf uYsp/iK6nxsxGPW0cHxP5Ma0nFzyNRYB5e2t23qQWRztzN857Pr7tWC4VBPpAxM8uQKr CgVkAZ24NWDGdx9TihVKn6uEldSR7PIlTF0AiSDreQFU229YaAnmdC4WdowujqCzQ4KC 6sNSSpssjxl9apemGAwJhUwoJD50WtBXF9E+76ORB4MXm3LCk25K/a6s9aoCR662GL6d dR9A==
X-Received: by 10.204.239.132 with SMTP id kw4mr4461604bkb.39.1373405117379; Tue, 09 Jul 2013 14:25:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from thomson-osx.local (host-109-107-11-157.ip.jarsat.pl. [109.107.11.157]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id m6sm6284571bki.7.2013.07.09.14.25.15 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 09 Jul 2013 14:25:16 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <51DC7FB9.6090300@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2013 23:25:13 +0200
From: Tomek Mrugalski <tomasz.mrugalski@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
References: <3135C2851EB6764BACEF35D8B495596806E7DAB304@MOPESMBX01.eu.thmulti.com> <51C31065.8040804@gmail.com> <8D23D4052ABE7A4490E77B1A012B6307751E2D82@mbx-01.win.nominum.com> <D8248E5E-A333-4C6D-AA43-711A4E99C852@gmail.com> <51C32C73.1010203@gmail.com> <51DABF73.7060300@gmail.com> <D37B7542-E258-4ED5-BAD4-5FD6D61DEE26@gmail.com>, <51DBFB65.2000309@gmail.com> <CBAC5174-4691-4265-8B1F-400BB323741C@cisco.com> <51DC40D7.7090104@gmail.com> <8D23D4052ABE7A4490E77B1A012B63077520691B@mbx-01.win.nominum.com>
In-Reply-To: <8D23D4052ABE7A4490E77B1A012B63077520691B@mbx-01.win.nominum.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "dhcwg@ietf.org WG" <dhcwg@ietf.org>, "Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com>, Ralph Droms <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] WGLC on draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-solmaxrt-update-01 - respond by July 4
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2013 21:25:22 -0000

On 13-07-09 20:42, Ted Lemon wrote:
> On Jul 9, 2013, at 12:56 PM, Tomek Mrugalski <tomasz.mrugalski@gmail.com> wrote:
>> - You don't have race conditions between advertises from different
>> servers sending different values in advertise.
> 
> If there are multiple servers sending different values, it seems likely that something is broken.
Yes, I stated that in previous mail. That is either a configuration
error or a rogue server. Nevertheless it would be good if client could
handle such situation gently. Ralph's proposal to use only options from
REPLY does that.

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status