IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dhcwg] Martin Duke's Discuss on draft-ietf-dhc-v6only-05: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Jen Linkova <furry13@gmail.com> Thu, 30 July 2020 12:02 UTC

Return-Path: <furry13@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBDD03A10C4; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 05:02:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.849
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.849 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DlrxZPjv9bAR; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 05:02:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk1-x744.google.com (mail-qk1-x744.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::744]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B9AE03A10C3; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 05:02:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk1-x744.google.com with SMTP id b79so25237519qkg.9; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 05:02:32 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=qW0DXGPkR3UyyvkvcLeAqtbZJ9EzygHRDXJlteR8OnM=; b=ZzYWw8zyu4BD03PlK37rmTzLrO8xy/JqmbLKGCDMqCWLx1pB1uj3gpmO96Q6S/HYtd fpNyP7+zsmFP3qk2S6sdR2SbAtMsiFua0qD3/jgBcmcdEQRmzKWjcX3SiRkTiS5SW4S/ hIjgEJe5SGpMMJnqMXL6cIXRyaFVrzCc/A2YUvEjHCZXKG3KydERxTqt2O2gMARM+eY8 5EVpUMIknoDNDnrn0oGn+zv22cfEbl+pl1QgxfCf4xXAhaZlK0f1LKc5ecejgTXRGD1J Bi17HZlrtrKrWFfAUjx0SdNudbCSJJWwTiCPI+IEGlZ928DaRc0bGV5cQRGFqlxXsVVT Cflw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=qW0DXGPkR3UyyvkvcLeAqtbZJ9EzygHRDXJlteR8OnM=; b=TuFubomLTeFkvFqeyS5lUyd8la5CZKSHGeVWDrKLidvo3A7t06Gq63uFNsCWqKzYMB rKhHh1kGIUzinWC3p+5yhFfhCpI6ZTgLq2yODLfm1A0sWVJi/ZACC9DQLBQ/miSbfB3h /fEiRmNNjGxs67gS1T4VlrKfT7POHwHpcL1z3srab9vK7bUZdnL0ZQ/M7bgzDAVEWboN Zm/8OL2OglW+ls1jKyATFBo9T7oWK6FAFq+5j5to1aXtUr8ljgUCl37cD3YNTXPSlGXu VkTVEyMeoME1kbB0GiJ3YeAGWpR+aa/eiccegzoHaxYA2ZROcQtXXgtTUiOvVjeiXd7J 7dmw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532ZHfo27Gysg6n0m3LodacciZ2sUoUlcZAzaEdxXVOcWrOePsNZ 9p8xH864zj3EBBEosFxzzARSe78m7CY2FUzKfOQ=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy7KW8l7Uu86nAEc0ZPTTtO8ZSfeI+WIgueqd4Bcu3p+zvA8jnsaRrMIW6qhYTFLVZt1MzRPb2AZ7YwWlnnbE0=
X-Received: by 2002:a37:a354:: with SMTP id m81mr37607201qke.277.1596110551475; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 05:02:31 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <159606370302.11342.6386305944714261698@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAFU7BATqgZBJs5MaE-C9b6N28=bFS1m4rJQxpVEYX3y29NOFRg@mail.gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr0o8vVFYJnGjXMFNifO7f45pnR=z2Jzq4KX504CKizasQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAKD1Yr0o8vVFYJnGjXMFNifO7f45pnR=z2Jzq4KX504CKizasQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Jen Linkova <furry13@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2020 22:02:20 +1000
Message-ID: <CAFU7BAStu0Vmyh1Qt2PLqsmo33Z_oDkJJV_6X4xvz+cPNPy9EQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Cc: Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-dhc-v6only@ietf.org, "Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com>, dhcwg@ietf.org, dhc-chairs@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/N8fqr6b9NATVn_zO1hmSnAr9WfY>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] Martin Duke's Discuss on draft-ietf-dhc-v6only-05: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2020 12:02:36 -0000

Ack, the Github version updated.

On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 8:41 PM Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> wrote:
>
> Jen,
>
> suggested text LGTM, suggestions inline.
>
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 10:31 AM Jen Linkova <furry13@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> However it should be noted that if the network does
>> not provide protection from a rogue DHCPv4 server the similar attack
>> vector can be executed by setting the Lease Time option value field to
>> 0xffffffff.
>
>
> Suggest "... can be executed by offering an invalid address and setting the Lease Time option value field to 0xffffffff."
>
>>
>> The latter attack would also affect hosts without
>> IPv6-only Preferred option support.
>
>
> Suggest "...would affect all hosts, not just hosts that support the IPv6-only Preferred option."
>
> Cheers,
> Lorenzo



-- 
SY, Jen Linkova aka Furry

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email