Re: [dhcwg] Martin Duke's Discuss on draft-ietf-dhc-v6only-05: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> Thu, 30 July 2020 10:41 UTC

Return-Path: <lorenzo@google.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 972F03A07EE for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 03:41:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -17.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH=-0.5, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL=-7.5] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hhRwC7ooV2YM for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 03:41:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-il1-x130.google.com (mail-il1-x130.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::130]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7C92F3A1068 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 03:41:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-il1-x130.google.com with SMTP id p16so11250379ile.0 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 03:41:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=pjW93tS2xC2c0NksLNljJhDFjZNZxFzGtaFi3tBA7+U=; b=nAFhnSchyO4UrN26sm93AnVtm3RK7eUsXGGdwqNXcRJuuF7hyQPrpBuekQcDlF/l1l ZSMPYiMOyn/fPIGdaVXMIG6l9bcdqzRtI9OsCRs3eA5J49gErPbZPle7EUuVGSbeeikm SQIVw0gUkZjEPUi3Ry5kRO8KrWPzvssXltEub1/iVWQi/TGG6Yi0tT0eUiOlBuwPw8AH Gf2qt+9bYF6G3eyYM4KoODST5/8gDC719K9lh8xbFUAWOTM/SqJryW8vaeTxMuVr4fbL kDBLXKQBgRfl+Ow7gepwENX18Kmy1AevAR860DOMURyCrzMR7F8HCPGE06ruihYf138L TrZQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=pjW93tS2xC2c0NksLNljJhDFjZNZxFzGtaFi3tBA7+U=; b=bA3gWyaHL5n2/zUqydGw1vcO611ZKBtxNQV9F1obS/356UrCllEUMOaSY5176bSkSh s0rQ84nr3sNTYajvkwzIMh8sVYMpdRSF9jo6JG5o+xPzm7zkxjWgSuYIh8+TEh/MTM8I wrtIsO8dW/X8Y7JA1pkI/E83UdFilNeR585lP/eXd7KVK8sgInKDVCMhtaTQA36hwR6J shJ6DQKcS7pWdabhjaFfzRKyziH4H2s/YwjJ2h4OzRALJ6pYzQFwUPpClHCXMePOUdb1 DmBFTc0wQqXHDbiYVXOgIKKyFZlpm6O9SAUOeIGmSr07nf4cWY+atJAtBhfaUeh/oZpK HaEA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532XQVe87rn3EPJpf4Ll2ONqHDTQ+06ppC0kjLOeTpHsXlwVBQJe Wzo0cFckeoDRCZq6G+onJnBT86VuxXfWjFeeScaR9w==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzck7Vq0bISsZeSNQDXIRHV1FCLsDKszOK9DteEcyIOXijkPs0xm0JtAEdsvQVBrYIkDxLxcCSUKj3RTT3A9N0=
X-Received: by 2002:a92:4b08:: with SMTP id m8mr36748116ilg.150.1596105709613; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 03:41:49 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <159606370302.11342.6386305944714261698@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAFU7BATqgZBJs5MaE-C9b6N28=bFS1m4rJQxpVEYX3y29NOFRg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAFU7BATqgZBJs5MaE-C9b6N28=bFS1m4rJQxpVEYX3y29NOFRg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2020 19:41:38 +0900
Message-ID: <CAKD1Yr0o8vVFYJnGjXMFNifO7f45pnR=z2Jzq4KX504CKizasQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Jen Linkova <furry13@gmail.com>
Cc: Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-dhc-v6only@ietf.org, "Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com>, dhcwg@ietf.org, dhc-chairs@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000d8fb2205aba651f2"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/UQNKNCHKQo9WPSXaIos1cnweF5s>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] Martin Duke's Discuss on draft-ietf-dhc-v6only-05: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2020 10:41:54 -0000

Jen,

suggested text LGTM, suggestions inline.

On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 10:31 AM Jen Linkova <furry13@gmail.com> wrote:

> However it should be noted that if the network does
> not provide protection from a rogue DHCPv4 server the similar attack
> vector can be executed by setting the Lease Time option value field to
> 0xffffffff.


Suggest "... can be executed by offering an invalid address and setting the
Lease Time option value field to 0xffffffff."


> The latter attack would also affect hosts without
> IPv6-only Preferred option support.


Suggest "...would affect all hosts, not just hosts that support the
IPv6-only Preferred option."

Cheers,
Lorenzo