IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dhcwg] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dhc-conn-status-00.txt

"Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com> Wed, 05 February 2014 22:15 UTC

Return-Path: <volz@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01BA91A022E for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Feb 2014 14:15:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.036
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.036 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.535, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bo9aOVi5nXAM for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Feb 2014 14:14:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-5.cisco.com (alln-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.142.92]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 225911A0209 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Feb 2014 14:14:58 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1273; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1391638497; x=1392848097; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=jFVe7+HzviBTQhsI5IximjJJomLehCdUi3SMpUZpZTw=; b=CvJ+EskIYiLqQSMO8lWFhQHgX/eUQ9z2GCavabGaGOFbHrUCCGjgSkFv wYBh6fwhd5Wz+idN9G0Dxxarf1Rf8bI8qoxJyajAltWiWxl2H8PF5twTA JGOkk0tzHTuXUnibE0aZ2y97pRzYyhggr0t+lHvgXi9eFwoa2kxRGWHWS o=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AkQFAAm38lKtJXG8/2dsb2JhbABZgww4V75bgREWdIIlAQEBBAEBATc0CwwEAgEIEQQBAQEKFAkHJwsUCQgCBAENBQgTh2oNzmQTBI5EMQcGgx6BFAEDqkyDLYIq
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,789,1384300800"; d="scan'208";a="18299360"
Received: from rcdn-core2-1.cisco.com ([173.37.113.188]) by alln-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP; 05 Feb 2014 22:14:56 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x09.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x09.cisco.com [173.37.183.83]) by rcdn-core2-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s15MEupL010889 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Wed, 5 Feb 2014 22:14:56 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com ([169.254.8.213]) by xhc-rcd-x09.cisco.com ([173.37.183.83]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Wed, 5 Feb 2014 16:14:56 -0600
From: "Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com>
To: Ted Lemon <ted.lemon@nominum.com>, Sten Carlsen <stenc@s-carlsen.dk>
Thread-Topic: [dhcwg] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dhc-conn-status-00.txt
Thread-Index: AQHPIqGT9bzRNIc0t0+9ZDQfaLepUpqnNbHA
Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2014 22:14:55 +0000
Message-ID: <489D13FBFA9B3E41812EA89F188F018E1AE594E4@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com>
References: <20140204093611.4914.51694.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <52F0F3C2.20807@viagenie.ca> <4B094E1A-431F-4F2B-9004-37D6D12BE8F8@nominum.com> <52F0F8F4.4060905@viagenie.ca> <EEEC392B-7B7B-4AAE-BE24-AEC944DFABFA@nominum.com> <CF17B34D.17390%praspati@cisco.com> <07C71B9E-3D2B-4714-9A5C-67C51B9F028F@nominum.com> <CF183474.17FEB%praspati@cisco.com> <48ADF973-C96B-415D-BA95-0EE5311114E2@nominum.com> <CF184487.18206%praspati@cisco.com> <D3DCF5DD-549F-4F73-B33E-8F6A428606BD@nominum.com> <52F25607.8060706@s-carlsen.dk> <1C267188-BEF2-47C5-9347-D50132FF6D73@nominum.com>
In-Reply-To: <1C267188-BEF2-47C5-9347-D50132FF6D73@nominum.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.86.242.51]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "dhcwg@ietf.org WG" <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dhc-conn-status-00.txt
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2014 22:15:00 -0000

Yeah, I was kind of skeptical about this too ... but (at least some) coauthors are from a router vendor, so they obviously believe this is worth doing (or getting someone within their organization to do). And, that issue was asked at the Vancouver IETF:

    Ted: the draft creates a problem: dual stack should always connect
      to IPv6 only
    Ted: asked if on charter?
    Ted: what router vendors plan to implement (Cisco as authors are
      from there)
    Simon Perreault: likes the solution

- Bernie

-----Original Message-----
From: dhcwg [mailto:dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Ted Lemon
Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2014 1:39 PM
To: Sten Carlsen
Cc: dhcwg@ietf.org WG
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dhc-conn-status-00.txt

On Feb 5, 2014, at 10:17 AM, Sten Carlsen <stenc@s-carlsen.dk> wrote:
> Is anything more needed? I am surely missing some detail here.

The theory is that the relay agent will be able to inform the DHCPv6 server that this has happened.   I'm just having trouble imagining when this will happen, or why it's worth putting into a router's firmware.

_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list
dhcwg@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email