IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dhcwg] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dhc-conn-status-00.txt

"Prashanth Patil (praspati)" <praspati@cisco.com> Wed, 05 February 2014 14:15 UTC

Return-Path: <praspati@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CCEA1A0153 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Feb 2014 06:15:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.036
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.036 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.535, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QqhajHAp3DV0 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Feb 2014 06:15:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-2.cisco.com (alln-iport-2.cisco.com [173.37.142.89]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A2A01A0147 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Feb 2014 06:15:05 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=770; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1391609705; x=1392819305; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=2lR01Bpxf0ZF2M8Mq1MkYWk7/wOVOhTnrKnsaSylNxo=; b=J61WyHDSwel/E/XByA+rqoWnxnyBwTFFhSKdFH+xdnkult5VxgUAblah Woey3Q0fUTxwrOlfCZ1F6uhj8FxKAfus64GB/K2js84fxhFrFppgoZJDD yz2kM1hpknZaaJY/rHUuODWpEzI3rtpDLF/qtRKmxmn7/JuJLxkHlayhN I=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AhMFADJG8lKtJXG9/2dsb2JhbABZgww4V75DgQ4WdIIlAQEBBDo/EAIBCBgeEDIlAgQOBYgFDc86F451B4Q4AQOYK4EykG+DLYIq
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,786,1384300800"; d="scan'208";a="18142759"
Received: from rcdn-core2-2.cisco.com ([173.37.113.189]) by alln-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 05 Feb 2014 14:15:04 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x15.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x15.cisco.com [173.37.183.89]) by rcdn-core2-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s15EF43g009762 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Wed, 5 Feb 2014 14:15:04 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x07.cisco.com ([169.254.7.109]) by xhc-rcd-x15.cisco.com ([173.37.183.89]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Wed, 5 Feb 2014 08:15:04 -0600
From: "Prashanth Patil (praspati)" <praspati@cisco.com>
To: Ted Lemon <ted.lemon@nominum.com>
Thread-Topic: [dhcwg] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dhc-conn-status-00.txt
Thread-Index: AQHPIm/88WLbaB69ZEKJQ9CMuC10qZqmrb4dgADHe4A=
Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2014 14:15:03 +0000
Message-ID: <CF184487.18206%praspati@cisco.com>
References: <20140204093611.4914.51694.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <52F0F3C2.20807@viagenie.ca> <4B094E1A-431F-4F2B-9004-37D6D12BE8F8@nominum.com> <52F0F8F4.4060905@viagenie.ca> <EEEC392B-7B7B-4AAE-BE24-AEC944DFABFA@nominum.com> <CF17B34D.17390%praspati@cisco.com> <07C71B9E-3D2B-4714-9A5C-67C51B9F028F@nominum.com> <CF183474.17FEB%praspati@cisco.com> <48ADF973-C96B-415D-BA95-0EE5311114E2@nominum.com>
In-Reply-To: <48ADF973-C96B-415D-BA95-0EE5311114E2@nominum.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.3.9.131030
x-originating-ip: [72.163.206.159]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <E20548F6D4BD7E4AB81C8BB9D7665BB0@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "dhcwg@ietf.org WG" <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dhc-conn-status-00.txt
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2014 14:15:07 -0000

On 2/5/14 7:20 PM, "Ted Lemon" <ted.lemon@nominum.com> wrote:

>On Feb 5, 2014, at 8:48 AM, Prashanth Patil (praspati)
><praspati@cisco.com> wrote:
>> I should've been more precise. I meant a relay, using snooping
>>mechanisms
>> (http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dhc-conn-status-00#section-7),
>> detecting that IPv4 is no longer active (even if lease hasn't expired)
>>and
>> signaling this to the server.
>
>This seems pretty sketchy.

Yes, I suppose it is. The desire was to better manage configuration sent
down to the host, if possible. Especially if I started dual stack, see my
IPv6 working great and decide to turn off IPv4. The server could then
reconfigure appropriately, maybe with something more v6 efficient.


-Prashanth

>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email