IETF Logo Mail Archive

[dhcwg] Helping with draft-ietf-dhc-option-guidelines

Tomek Mrugalski <tomasz.mrugalski@gmail.com> Thu, 29 March 2012 09:31 UTC

Return-Path: <tomasz.mrugalski@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB2AC21F89BD for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 02:31:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VUSnk6Gj2xXi for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 02:31:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-bk0-f44.google.com (mail-bk0-f44.google.com [209.85.214.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1430D21F8A63 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 02:31:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by bkuw5 with SMTP id w5so1930248bku.31 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 02:31:27 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=6TrnvkgPSQhsaeoKwkGoq2zCDZMFGdaOH56a5O5i1YE=; b=DMryxH36iQc36wn4XtqmnHLvpcAbuNxUQz1kZqutb/9LK9YJyeDI4KEUQ6ozSOQ8RP v92cgPE72NUYzCKXKEZn8QICa2KksA/zvpvKhf9BNvBozfAOUdOYWTDzGEYkvHCXt/M6 wEcDswXqC32cvvgCGqsy/aNsWXn1ycw5j0LpQVjnRMRpQDSAXKpeFUDS4crAI2kvoswO /W57ZtphkcFRchvv8cTsNvk7iw3JRlMhOGK7GWGvMOavDnI5I6lYau3Prf0mf9r+iSPJ ibZcvlGARnRw8rIc61VeHWgi3Gt3QN3LIOzwRwf7BUfZDF5Dd0+3BiqeP5xWjvBCtnNE r8Yg==
Received: by 10.204.150.86 with SMTP id x22mr13826016bkv.136.1333013487629; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 02:31:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dhcp-158e.meeting.ietf.org ([2001:df8:0:16:cabc:c8ff:fedf:daff]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id jd17sm12313148bkb.4.2012.03.29.02.31.26 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 29 Mar 2012 02:31:27 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4F742BEE.7040200@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 11:31:26 +0200
From: Tomek Mrugalski <tomasz.mrugalski@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: DHC WG <dhcwg@ietf.org>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [dhcwg] Helping with draft-ietf-dhc-option-guidelines
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 09:31:30 -0000

Hi,

I would like to confirm what I stated during DHC meeting. I'm interested
in this draft going forward. Ted asked for voluneers to help with this
work. I will join this effort once work on DHCPv6 route option is
completed. I was also just told that there is one other person, who is
interested in joining this effort.

I'm not sure how we should proceed with this? Should we contact David
and ask him to upload -08 version with new co-author(s)? Or perhaps
start new draft based on this, but focused on DHCPv6 only? What happens
with the original draft-ietf-dhc-option-guidelines then? Can it be
removed somehow from WG item list?

Cheers,
Tomek Mrugalski

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email