IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dhcwg] Adoption Call for draft-cui-dhc-dhcpv6-prefix-length-hint-issue (Ends January 8, 2016)

"Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com> Wed, 06 January 2016 17:49 UTC

Return-Path: <volz@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F80B1A0029 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Jan 2016 09:49:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.51
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jN5OnMbmshdF for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Jan 2016 09:49:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com [173.37.86.77]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 154B41A0026 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Jan 2016 09:49:25 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=15206; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1452102565; x=1453312165; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: mime-version; bh=AcMa5fzckC6F0Rsyh2t7q73/FF5+NVBuz6QVP698rAk=; b=DRw3c+AWRMWeA2W5L6B7/5h3VV1NglOPBx+bZOoxCc1elXhBzsLHFFjQ IZdjqKEjYcFbYQ+62QZTODiXYP6yOtQ/RlOVhvJZQF413y5un6Ynhf8Vf 13EIBCdxQOlaOu0J0oyTQ565nIfhvwiBRLLa/M40jXqgC6Tze824p4aeB U=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0DUAgB1Uo1W/4kNJK1egm5MUm0GhTWDHqQDj1QBDYFkJIQUgVcCgSQ4FAEBAQEBAQF/C4Q0AQEBBB0QXAIBCBEEAQEoBzIUCQgBAQQTCIgnDsF8AQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBGItVgTyCahEBTAmELwWXCgGFQYgMgWNKg3mIW45GAREPAQFCgkqBQHIBhB46gQgBAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="5.20,530,1444694400"; d="scan'208,217"; a="61220198"
Received: from alln-core-4.cisco.com ([173.36.13.137]) by rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 06 Jan 2016 17:49:24 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com (xch-aln-003.cisco.com [173.36.7.13]) by alln-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u06HnNLT015288 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Jan 2016 17:49:24 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-003.cisco.com (173.36.7.13) by XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com (173.36.7.13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Wed, 6 Jan 2016 11:49:23 -0600
Received: from xch-aln-003.cisco.com ([173.36.7.13]) by XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com ([173.36.7.13]) with mapi id 15.00.1104.009; Wed, 6 Jan 2016 11:49:23 -0600
From: "Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com>
To: "dhcwg@ietf.org" <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Adoption Call for draft-cui-dhc-dhcpv6-prefix-length-hint-issue (Ends January 8, 2016)
Thread-Index: AdE4MfuqkAEjr/PZS32nv4P+3Sj+0QK5tiJAAWRdgKA=
Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2016 17:49:23 +0000
Message-ID: <bea9b87ae80344009d37d4cd0dfd91c7@XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com>
References: <ece35e634c91412e86004506b89477c7@XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com> <e18918b1b3a74fe3a05e563a9c627506@XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <e18918b1b3a74fe3a05e563a9c627506@XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.131.78.123]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_bea9b87ae80344009d37d4cd0dfd91c7XCHALN003ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/SCluP9vw7WvtnH7xUCpuYLKRD6k>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] Adoption Call for draft-cui-dhc-dhcpv6-prefix-length-hint-issue (Ends January 8, 2016)
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2016 17:49:27 -0000

(WG co-chair hat off) I do support adoption of this work. I think this is useful work to help clarify how clients/servers should interact in getting the "proper" prefix lengths.


-          Bernie

From: dhcwg [mailto:dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Bernie Volz (volz)
Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2015 10:44 AM
To: dhcwg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] Adoption Call for draft-cui-dhc-dhcpv6-prefix-length-hint-issue (Ends January 8, 2016)

Reminder - Adoption call ends January 8.


-          Bernie

From: dhcwg [mailto:dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Bernie Volz (volz)
Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2015 1:46 PM
To: dhcwg@ietf.org<mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
Subject: [dhcwg] Adoption Call for draft-cui-dhc-dhcpv6-prefix-length-hint-issue (Ends January 8, 2016)


Hello:



This email initiates a WG call for adoption of the draft-cui-dhc-dhcpv6-prefix-length-hint-issue-03 (http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-cui-dhc-dhcpv6-prefix-length-hint-issue-03) document as a DHC WG work item.



Please indicate whether you support the adoption or not, and if not, why not. See https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7221#section-2.2 if you have questions about the criteria for adoption. This document falls within the WG Charter (https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/dhc/charter/) under items #2, #3, and #4.



There are currently NO IPR claims against this draft (please see http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/dhc/documents/ as this could change at any time).



The co-chairs will determine the consensus after January 8, 2016. (This is a longer period than usual because of the year end Holidays.)



Happy Holidays & New Year!



-          Tomek & Bernie

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email