Re: [dhcwg] Adoption Call for draft-cui-dhc-dhcpv6-prefix-length-hint-issue (Ends January 8, 2016)

Hi,

As a co-authors of this document, I support adopting it as a WG item.

This document explains in detail how the DHCPv6 prefix-length hint could be
used or handled, which is not clearly specified in any other documents. For
those who would like to use the prefix-length hint, having a document like
this would provide very helpful guideline. There could be additional
improvements to the document, but I believe it is very useful work for the
WG.

Thanks,
Tianxiang

2015-12-17 2:45 GMT+08:00 Bernie Volz (volz) <volz@cisco.com>:

> Hello:
>
>
>
> This email initiates a WG call for adoption of the
> draft-cui-dhc-dhcpv6-prefix-length-hint-issue-03 (
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-cui-dhc-dhcpv6-prefix-length-hint-issue-03)
> document as a DHC WG work item.
>
>
>
> Please indicate whether you support the adoption or not, and if not, why
> not. See https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7221#section-2.2 if you have
> questions about the criteria for adoption. This document falls within the
> WG Charter (https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/dhc/charter/) under items #2,
> #3, and #4.
>
>
>
> There are currently NO IPR claims against this draft (please see
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/dhc/documents/ as this could change at any
> time).
>
>
>
> The co-chairs will determine the consensus after January 8, 2016. (This is
> a longer period than usual because of the year end Holidays.)
>
>
>
> Happy Holidays & New Year!
>
>
>
> -          Tomek & Bernie
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> dhcwg mailing list
> dhcwg@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg
>
>