Re: COME ON FOLKS!!!! RE: [dhcwg] dhc WG last call on <draft-ietf-dhc-ddns-resolution-08.txt>

[Mark Stapp <[e-mail]>]

yes, I want this draft to advance to the iesg (and, just maybe, beyond)

thank you for your energy and determination, Bernie!

-- Mark

Bernie Volz (volz) wrote:

>I don't believe there were ANY responses to this WG last call. Either
>positive or negative.
>
>Now, we can all complain about the slow progress within the IETF, but WE
>ARE THE CAUSE OF THOSE PROBLEMS! Not the IESG.
>
>The FQDN related work has been stalled for YEARS! Several different
>people have worked on it and it has never been brought to closure.
>
>Well, I thought we finally had a good chance to bring this work to a
>close, but it just won't happen if YOU ALL don't want it to happen.
>Apparently no one cares about this issue??
>
>And this document, as I understand it, is the last piece of work holding
>up the FQDN drafts (though of course there may be issues raised within
>the IETF last call and/or IESG review).
>
>As the WG Last Call period has officially ended, I don't know if the
>chairs will accept comments, but it certainly can't hurt for people to
>respond one way or another.
>
>Personally, I'm not going to put a lot more effort into this work if the
>WG won't support it. So, it will soon fall to yet another person or
>group to complete this work (if it ever will be).
>
>Sorry for the rant.
>
>- Bernie
> 
>
>  
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: [e-mail] [mailto:[e-mail]] 
>>On Behalf Of Ralph Droms
>>Sent: Monday, April 11, 2005 3:08 PM
>>To: [e-mail]
>>Cc: Stig Venaas
>>Subject: [dhcwg] dhc WG last call on 
>><draft-ietf-dhc-ddns-resolution-08.txt>
>>
>>
>>This message announces a WG last call on "Resolution of DNS
>>Name Conflicts among DHCP Clients"
>><draft-ietf-dhc-ddns-resolution-08.txt>.  The last call will
>>conclude at 1700 EST (USA) on 2005-04-25.
>>
>>Please respond to this WG last call.  If you support
>>acceptance of the document without change, respond with a
>>simple acknowledgment, so that support for the document can
>>be assessed.  Lack of discussion does not represent positive
>>support.  If there is no expression of support for
>>acceptance during the WG last call, the document will not be
>>advanced to the IESG.
>>
>>There are options in DHCP that can be used for transmitting
>>information about updating DNS. However, these do not
>>explicitly control updating the name to address and address
>>to name mappings maintained in the DNS, as performed by
>>hosts acting as DHCP clients and servers.
>>draft-ietf-dhc-ddns-resolution-08.txt describes techniques
>>for the resolution of DNS name conflicts among DHCP clients
>>and servers.  This draft is available as
>>http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-dhc-ddns-
>>resolution-08.txt
>>
>>- Ralph Droms 
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>dhcwg mailing list
>>[e-mail]
>>https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg
>>
>>    
>>
>
>_______________________________________________
>dhcwg mailing list
>[e-mail]
>https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg
>
>  
>

_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list
[e-mail]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg