IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dhcwg] Iotdir last call review of draft-ietf-dhc-v6only-03

Jen Linkova <furry13@gmail.com> Wed, 24 June 2020 00:20 UTC

Return-Path: <furry13@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B4333A0CBB; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 17:20:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.848
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.848 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CAJZN1-87j35; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 17:20:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk1-x72f.google.com (mail-qk1-x72f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::72f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 938A33A0CBA; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 17:20:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk1-x72f.google.com with SMTP id e13so297566qkg.5; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 17:20:28 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=jbWR/1rr/FJbEWVCpcd5IibEzd6ckQ08Z9OuGMpXLsY=; b=BianGSaTLAsF/Mmz95+I9apy+hXTMmt2hZ3AVojXaL7RS9CqD6XjKy8osSNwcwOtTw CK8TtqAu8JHUVfzqfbDOf2zq31dqCGRi0j4is0U0v8Kn0oqLGVEmUfEansob86qxLa+P 3Gaap6vpPTWMkmDlwqI9INtMwRImYK8Pru03g7VCtAm+HjyfK6BtmMkb1NEakQo14Vyk n2qntZJa/9rHOuWuEZNEuYx6LsvNkuOwEgEb4cpY+Mt5Kfn+24i+AJjSB2YPLPJ5P0Sl Ji65BcPC50z8WFcPb5NWuXhRHHvyvaxs5i8oJ+8B35nzNhMlKmMOfKhhXYWo2J+EbppB zXJg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=jbWR/1rr/FJbEWVCpcd5IibEzd6ckQ08Z9OuGMpXLsY=; b=hqA3TgAeLZGrxYSXOu9GNlFbKcmqwj+WGjW0DhiDERu2Sp2+dWLXW/RUWsZ1hdWrfz 33se84AfVTAMzKe5zyonYr1i4vh1tPeLjQlE3CZob+yTcCkV+O514RmlE5KI0P7N+yhc NpwZwWAXbItTMcekloeMF4VseeujOTWoioFsW9lL/DCcGekF8MBkbuSB744zZ/h36jCE ikWuXdA9DsuFtNuLXby5t7TaTkPsUxYISDla/CO0BXHXy8EeTRza/+TQL+5RLtR1LeaZ n0ghzpUsL6sr1nl55e9Ey+tKfqZfP930buJ5dvMUNk1i1GJn0Pj6JBC/bBMgRR2rkMLl 4guw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533lOVu54F/oyVbQnO/PGsn3v2T9CxG3fZZ6fqmNhRnOqFaH3YQ4 tJkg/HYQfoHuGZAIAfftLKEC+rR/0Gr9qk3VtGY=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz1zMA5/QhKiAciM8IS9j7mzu0ttipgjpYg2CY1lulgYDFF/Z/FY0yT0I+cwR4wJ7KFrijHCH6xBwqq60lLSck=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:24b:: with SMTP id q11mr23060006qkn.277.1592958027590; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 17:20:27 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <159290613429.20258.90107321879676135@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <159290613429.20258.90107321879676135@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Jen Linkova <furry13@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2020 10:20:16 +1000
Message-ID: <CAFU7BAQ9XPkM0Rymn4ATqCDf0eVyvNr0SOBS4s4JbgMeg=4MHA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Pascal Thubert <pthubert@cisco.com>
Cc: iot-directorate@ietf.org, draft-ietf-dhc-v6only.all@ietf.org, dhcwg@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/V8qejp6XeahaubOIXoIR8N1AFYg>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] Iotdir last call review of draft-ietf-dhc-v6only-03
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2020 00:20:31 -0000

Hi Pascal,

Thank you for reviewing the document.
I believe Lorenzo explained why the draft supports NAT64 only.

Re: the terminology comment:
On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 7:55 PM Pascal Thubert via Datatracker
<noreply@ietf.org> wrote:
>    "
>                                              ... IPv6-only mode (either
>    because the OS and all applications are IPv6-only capable or because
>    the host has some form of 464XLAT [RFC6877] deployed),
>    "
>    Do we have a good reference of what we mean by the v6-only mode of a host
>    - or an interface for that matter ?
>
>    Else it would help to define it before we use it. Note, the terminology
>    defines a "IPv6-only capable host" but not the "mode".

I'll update the Terminology section with the following definition:
IPv6-only mode as 'a mode of operation when a host acts as IPv6-only
capable and does not have IPv4 addresses assigned (except for IPv4
link-local
   address [RFC3927]).

Would it address your comment?

--
SY, Jen Linkova aka Furry

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email