Re: [dhcwg] Iotdir last call review of draft-ietf-dhc-v6only-03
"Eric Vyncke (evyncke)" <evyncke@cisco.com> Tue, 23 June 2020 13:18 UTC
Return-Path: <evyncke@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47C8C3A0DA5; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 06:18:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=hqrIrjXN; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=GrCRbGje
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3dQ4KsExIigh; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 06:18:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-2.cisco.com (alln-iport-2.cisco.com [173.37.142.89]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EEDE73A0D8E; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 06:18:45 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=4048; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1592918326; x=1594127926; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=M2dKlhq4nV2oIUl/cYQC3JlTVEUpawcIpDC6fBheL7o=; b=hqrIrjXNycZRm5uYNzY2J3RVslioA4Hek+gMaG7Hbt1NEH8f5QMZbWdN 3gWmO4FaVs+VPTpKxKTcbBTYRrOWnHFLyRGtfltIkNGLZiQOvsGMMOc6w t0m7DrYm6SD3imvojVHBpfMvIWrKDeKsZXV7BgV4G6ozbX5n11+fSShaj I=;
IronPort-PHdr: 9a23:bU/pXRbOZkvoMag0rl2FNgv/LSx94ef9IxIV55w7irlHbqWk+dH4MVfC4el21QaVD47a8PlDzeHRtvOoVW8B5MOHt3YPONxJWgQegMob1wonHIaeCEL9IfKrCk5yHMlLWFJ/uX3uN09TFZX1ZkbZpTu56jtBUhn6PBB+c+LyHIOahs+r1ue0rpvUZQgAhDe0bb5oahusqgCEvcgNiowkIaE0mRY=
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0CVBQDsAPJe/4ENJK1mHAEBAQEBAQcBARIBAQQEAQFAgUqBUiMuB4FHLyyEJINGA41DigCOVYJSA1ULAQEBDAEBLQIEAQGERwIXgXwCJDgTAgMBAQsBAQUBAQECAQYEbYVbDIVyAQEBAQMSEREMAQE3AQsEAgEIEQMBAgMCJgICAh8RFAEICAIEAQ0FGweDBIJMAy4BrCMCgTmIYXaBMoMBAQEFhQ0NC4IOCYEOKoJniXwagUE/gTgcgk0+ghqCCxiDFDOCLY8hgwuhZ00KglqUQASEZwMdnnuRMYxukVsCBAIEBQIOAQEFgWoiNoEgcBVlAYI+UBcCDY4eB4NqilZ0NwIGAQcBAQMJfI9pAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.75,271,1589241600"; d="scan'208";a="518452043"
Received: from alln-core-9.cisco.com ([173.36.13.129]) by alln-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 23 Jun 2020 13:18:41 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-004.cisco.com (xch-rcd-004.cisco.com [173.37.102.14]) by alln-core-9.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 05NDIfC1010170 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 23 Jun 2020 13:18:41 GMT
Received: from xhs-rcd-002.cisco.com (173.37.227.247) by XCH-RCD-004.cisco.com (173.37.102.14) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 08:18:41 -0500
Received: from xhs-aln-001.cisco.com (173.37.135.118) by xhs-rcd-002.cisco.com (173.37.227.247) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 08:18:40 -0500
Received: from NAM04-CO1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (173.37.151.57) by xhs-aln-001.cisco.com (173.37.135.118) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 08:18:40 -0500
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=oIwl9O/ITgRruEnXPnVoUZTHuaMTNNMnVhntYMc7t8cNedknyN7zDKBWzIbHERJxHjvjl5T9cOrGfQfhhgJW4JXfVvoxk8Iy0lQVbHW/c5b66bwdVlm5e6K5UL6R+S+cgeB6j+myX6CZVdfp1Ugv2n48niZ2dtZXxuhAs/Taa0kVle8CvaZpn+qHSNzE2jbS0WmJ9gH/trAH1U9APJJak6ox7pd0kUmC+Aa0htwBTMdKHzHk4KxHxTlj4jC7g+VclDcglhWk2Ke/tFIqdtZkQdcA349NiDa/Plv8DXdts7Cf2GZFAmQ9pkSWI04kyJs6wPA+xaGuHXpWBVD4BXwATg==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=M2dKlhq4nV2oIUl/cYQC3JlTVEUpawcIpDC6fBheL7o=; b=jMjJxUO1zwmYx9x8F0IMH075uIeDJQjSBrxRF+0bsrA4RcML77zeua4bNbQs25ObbNFIldX2zHPkq+DtxqtODOyS/6JaGoOly1yyzuhi/plpFULfq6eUn8If28/9VZVm7WP0RpiyrnWoL1GoRfwRROirhmwJVSZLnY1RQX3SeFdY25Lq8VzRNjlaAeZflzwA3u+ntJHbEJXSqXCIbxsdV2H9PPhIxxoXOck3fA6/B4K3cE8WrXBaAOaqPMwgGihJnHBDmke9z/CW75i522o4YTe+IbdD2x9CKoitWvVPFcNG2KPH80wMCojcnZHWkeJMzwhXIdP4B1GwqxaZNPARWQ==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=M2dKlhq4nV2oIUl/cYQC3JlTVEUpawcIpDC6fBheL7o=; b=GrCRbGje13EySCAyRyryw33BuejjyR4u/iY6wKOmDR7tvqCxAIDZx6L4dAsOniQJxrGogIyZ0NYJ2h/5ApfV+FAjLGoEpUw5GgjcpkEWdKWKV7muci1+EkgcGstv6nK34w6pXO7UaxyQamk7z23u+We297bHLttXXdIeGw/MK24=
Received: from DM5PR11MB1753.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:3:10d::13) by DM5PR11MB1340.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:3:15::16) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3109.21; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 13:18:39 +0000
Received: from DM5PR11MB1753.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::a14c:59b6:47b0:f630]) by DM5PR11MB1753.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::a14c:59b6:47b0:f630%7]) with mapi id 15.20.3109.027; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 13:18:39 +0000
From: "Eric Vyncke (evyncke)" <evyncke@cisco.com>
To: "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com>, "iot-directorate@ietf.org" <iot-directorate@ietf.org>
CC: "dhcwg@ietf.org" <dhcwg@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-dhc-v6only.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-dhc-v6only.all@ietf.org>, "last-call@ietf.org" <last-call@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Iotdir last call review of draft-ietf-dhc-v6only-03
Thread-Index: AQHWSUR3QFWbbQdvQku42VqdYtxSRKjmUJoA
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 13:18:39 +0000
Message-ID: <F18B8A86-E4F7-41FA-BB52-3976AA9E4047@cisco.com>
References: <159290613429.20258.90107321879676135@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <159290613429.20258.90107321879676135@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: fr-BE, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.38.20061401
authentication-results: cisco.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;cisco.com; dmarc=none action=none header.from=cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [2001:420:c0c1:36:7557:86e0:6ca6:aed]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: b60838d9-8d78-4e24-b467-08d81777f18b
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: DM5PR11MB1340:
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <DM5PR11MB1340C423831AA34A08C84FCAA9940@DM5PR11MB1340.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:10000;
x-forefront-prvs: 04433051BF
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: qtlcvBlGt/pUtfS4FQnwLTxBuEw6HoOFW6BiiN+oVTZXsQaDz9nju5+iyKVka8StdLv9umZND25Yj0Rrzf+DFY06/+FWAUt14S0UKYI4ekoqOIlcDpZ8kIWWXFk/uElTBQZpz/O69wjmfO4i+2lTA3Rxx+Gvemi9Va2VjdMsOCWYhOlPj01jleADNWHXgDlMtO9r5BvPt1Y6lVLOA/G0tWZVm9T1KYfRE0aWh7gFur9n+p37Rd1qXXbhh0UimqRsrAvKrq1nlXMjSGNahEF0juzyS+qSb42SGTzEaPps7GYziw3mgOnp8RAMxU478Ujl
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:DM5PR11MB1753.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFTY:; SFS:(4636009)(346002)(136003)(376002)(396003)(39860400002)(366004)(110136005)(83380400001)(8676002)(6486002)(54906003)(53546011)(316002)(6512007)(186003)(2906002)(478600001)(5660300002)(71200400001)(66946007)(6506007)(76116006)(4326008)(91956017)(8936002)(36756003)(64756008)(66556008)(66476007)(2616005)(66446008)(450100002)(86362001)(33656002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101;
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: w3HSFA+cKhCGHUkeNqeWztiAKsjJywUnGfT5q0ow6k9t/1Yq5cDka/0Sb3zYcSNvtpj0tTZBfUBllJnLGgfTlGcqhxg3pLZ7eFEoMPzkQqV3tbpeznV7CrkbJZweajpufxj+Bh6UfChND53SsnDT8TmctX4JwM6b5gtKQMKThLptUzpKCYNe0AEl1nuI7KaQ2f9H5Vv6BfaGE7J6wGxFn1GYv4eD4xXy/ne2hntKnCFTR6OIikXjxH+oX/GsmojVZwkQqcZ2U+DQfDW0T+wNtHetTIOS6aalz+LB/TP4aKVlGQZJPI18LZPEHwCBkBMu5j25r8z1ANbGTeKKv3xzHkTu/N0O0QTnep3lhBqQ74TnJxg1MEiWD1S6wElAKjKnUtlfJTqUx82VT64oTd6gKHQpZUBh9syG7KPtW6VlNN9lyJ6rOErGRkwNv8calHDZjVBw54dC7S2KUMoey7GQdFp++q1CKvkbMG2ehk6UfRrLErI/WD1zHaI36iKA0Wo39wM64BGulNhQJ4alCFxSgXOMc0OGVFlplCcs6m345PE=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <F0A9396090F5744AB0FF7CD60B33A4AA@namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: b60838d9-8d78-4e24-b467-08d81777f18b
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 23 Jun 2020 13:18:39.3177 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: ErUfiCedV71X0TyQchH9bA5BvCQIsFyXT6ngbPMgZ2tI47wrSFAJ47OUeTmiUmWy7fFXqP4krJ5DBrnd6mHhAg==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DM5PR11MB1340
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.37.102.14, xch-rcd-004.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: alln-core-9.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/uSQwhALgOmy0DgFrR8TRAl1BU6A>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] Iotdir last call review of draft-ietf-dhc-v6only-03
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 13:18:48 -0000
Thank you Pascal for your extensive review. -éric -----Original Message----- From: Pascal Thubert via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Reply-To: Pascal Thubert <pthubert@cisco.com> Date: Tuesday, 23 June 2020 at 11:55 To: "iot-directorate@ietf.org" <iot-directorate@ietf.org> Cc: "dhcwg@ietf.org" <dhcwg@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-dhc-v6only.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-dhc-v6only.all@ietf.org>, "last-call@ietf.org" <last-call@ietf.org> Subject: Iotdir last call review of draft-ietf-dhc-v6only-03 Resent-From: <alias-bounces@ietf.org> Resent-To: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>, <furry@google.com>, <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>, <tomasz.mrugalski@gmail.com>, <tim@qacafe.com>, <volz@cisco.com>, Eric Vyncke <evyncke@cisco.com>, <ek.ietf@gmail.com>, Bernie Volz <volz@cisco.com> Resent-Date: Tuesday, 23 June 2020 at 11:55 Reviewer: Pascal Thubert Review result: Ready with Issues draft-ietf-dhc-v6only-03 IOT-DIR review _______________________________________ This document specifies a DHCPv4 option to indicate that a host supports an IPv6-only mode and willing to forgo obtaining an IPv4 address if the network provides IPv6 connectivity. It is very readable and provides a clear justification of why the DHCP-based solution is well suited to address the problem. " ... IPv6-only mode (either because the OS and all applications are IPv6-only capable or because the host has some form of 464XLAT [RFC6877] deployed), " Do we have a good reference of what we mean by the v6-only mode of a host - or an interface for that matter ? Else it would help to define it before we use it. Note, the terminology defines a "IPv6-only capable host" but not the "mode". " A DHCPv4 client SHOULD allow a device administrator to configure IPv6-only preferred mode " and later " In a typical deployment scenario, a network administrator would not configure the DHCPv4 server to return the IPv6-only Preferred option unless the network provides NAT64 service. ... However it seems unlikely that any new transition technology would arise and be widely adopted in any foreseeable future. Therefore adding support for non-existing technologies seems to be suboptimal and the proposed mechanism implies that NAT64 is used to facilitate connectivity between IPv6 and IPv4. " I have a hard time with that one. Adding a byte or 2 of flags in the IPv6-Only Preferred option to indicate that the network supports NAT64 and having the host request the address if it needs the service and it's not there does not seem to cost a lot and protects the future.
- [dhcwg] Iotdir last call review of draft-ietf-dhc… Pascal Thubert via Datatracker
- Re: [dhcwg] Iotdir last call review of draft-ietf… Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
- Re: [dhcwg] Iotdir last call review of draft-ietf… Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: [dhcwg] Iotdir last call review of draft-ietf… Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: [dhcwg] [Last-Call] Iotdir last call review o… Philip Homburg
- Re: [dhcwg] [Last-Call] Iotdir last call review o… Michael Richardson
- Re: [dhcwg] [Last-Call] Iotdir last call review o… Ted Lemon
- Re: [dhcwg] [Last-Call] Iotdir last call review o… Philip Homburg
- Re: [dhcwg] [Last-Call] Iotdir last call review o… Ted Lemon
- Re: [dhcwg] [Last-Call] Iotdir last call review o… Michael Richardson
- Re: [dhcwg] Iotdir last call review of draft-ietf… Jen Linkova
- Re: [dhcwg] [Last-Call] Iotdir last call review o… Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: [dhcwg] Iotdir last call review of draft-ietf… Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: [dhcwg] Iotdir last call review of draft-ietf… Michael Richardson
- Re: [dhcwg] Iotdir last call review of draft-ietf… otroan
- Re: [dhcwg] Iotdir last call review of draft-ietf… Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: [dhcwg] Iotdir last call review of draft-ietf… Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: [dhcwg] Iotdir last call review of draft-ietf… Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: [dhcwg] [Last-Call] Iotdir last call review o… Philip Homburg
- Re: [dhcwg] [Last-Call] Iotdir last call review o… Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: [dhcwg] [Last-Call] Iotdir last call review o… Jen Linkova
- Re: [dhcwg] Iotdir last call review of draft-ietf… Michael Richardson
- Re: [dhcwg] Iotdir last call review of draft-ietf… otroan
- Re: [dhcwg] [Last-Call] Iotdir last call review o… Philip Homburg
- Re: [dhcwg] [Last-Call] Iotdir last call review o… Jen Linkova
- Re: [dhcwg] [Last-Call] Iotdir last call review o… Michael Richardson
- Re: [dhcwg] Iotdir last call review of draft-ietf… Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: [dhcwg] Iotdir last call review of draft-ietf… Pascal Thubert (pthubert)