[dhcwg] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-dhc-dynamic-shared-v4allocation-08: (with COMMENT)

"Ben Campbell" <ben@nostrum.com> Thu, 28 May 2015 13:51 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <20150528135051.2320.30944.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 06:50:51 -0700
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/VW25XfU-rB8grDAPjocjUnYhOTM>
Cc: draft-ietf-dhc-dynamic-shared-v4allocation.ad@ietf.org, volz@cisco.com, dhc-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-dhc-dynamic-shared-v4allocation@ietf.org, dhcwg@ietf.org, draft-ietf-dhc-dynamic-shared-v4allocation.shepherd@ietf.org
Subject: [dhcwg] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-dhc-dynamic-shared-v4allocation-08: (with COMMENT)

Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dhc-dynamic-shared-v4allocation-08: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dhc-dynamic-shared-v4allocation/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

In section 10.1, how could preserving port randomization 
become "less" difficult?Presumably the assigned port 
range will never be larger than "all the ports".

[Fixed in update]

[dhcwg] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf… Ben Campbell