Re: [dhcwg] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on draft-ietf-dhc-dynamic-shared-v4allocation-07: (with COMMENT)
Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com> Thu, 28 May 2015 13:48 UTC
Return-Path: <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D47071ACD0B; Thu, 28 May 2015 06:48:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DLBPCv-nVPkv; Thu, 28 May 2015 06:48:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sjc1-mx02-inside.nominum.com (sjc1-mx02-inside.nominum.com [64.89.234.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ED3391A88F7; Thu, 28 May 2015 06:48:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from webmail.nominum.com (cas-03.win.nominum.com [64.89.235.66]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certificate Authority - G2" (verified OK)) by sjc1-mx02-inside.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8AD97DA0077; Thu, 28 May 2015 13:48:09 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [10.0.20.133] (71.233.43.215) by CAS-03.WIN.NOMINUM.COM (192.168.1.100) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.224.2; Thu, 28 May 2015 06:48:03 -0700
References: <20150527233931.6042.26234.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <0250B544-8B63-4859-9AD5-2EB815FB81A7@nominum.com> <2A18C7C7-1F65-4D77-AD7B-E2A30558208E@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
In-Reply-To: <2A18C7C7-1F65-4D77-AD7B-E2A30558208E@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-ID: <F680D61E-8FBE-4114-BCD4-40E914E0F72A@nominum.com>
X-Mailer: iPad Mail (12F69)
From: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 09:48:02 -0400
To: Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Originating-IP: [71.233.43.215]
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/fa4O4h9RFlhQtJQFcm-3418hIsM>
Cc: "<draft-ietf-dhc-dynamic-shared-v4allocation.ad@ietf.org>" <draft-ietf-dhc-dynamic-shared-v4allocation.ad@ietf.org>, "<volz@cisco.com>" <volz@cisco.com>, "<draft-ietf-dhc-dynamic-shared-v4allocation.shepherd@ietf.org>" <draft-ietf-dhc-dynamic-shared-v4allocation.shepherd@ietf.org>, "<dhc-chairs@ietf.org>" <dhc-chairs@ietf.org>, "<draft-ietf-dhc-dynamic-shared-v4allocation@ietf.org>" <draft-ietf-dhc-dynamic-shared-v4allocation@ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "<dhcwg@ietf.org>" <dhcwg@ietf.org>, Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on draft-ietf-dhc-dynamic-shared-v4allocation-07: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 13:48:11 -0000
On May 28, 2015, at 7:42 AM, Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com> wrote: > > Thanks, Ted. I didn't see a reference from the Security Considerations section. If that's all that is needed, let's add it. I'll look at the base spec. I don't understand why such a reference would be useful. Will implementors of DHCP servers or clients that support this extension need to know about this in order to avoid some flaw in their implementation of this specification? If yes, can you explain what you think might be missing? If you can't think of an articulable gap here, I don't see any point in mentioning this.
- [dhcwg] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on draft… Kathleen Moriarty
- Re: [dhcwg] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on d… Ted Lemon
- Re: [dhcwg] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on d… Kathleen Moriarty
- Re: [dhcwg] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on d… Ted Lemon