[dhcwg] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on draft-ietf-dhc-dynamic-shared-v4allocation-07: (with COMMENT)

["Kathleen Moriarty" <[e-mail]>]

Kathleen Moriarty has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dhc-dynamic-shared-v4allocation-07: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dhc-dynamic-shared-v4allocation/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I have many of the same questions as Stephen, so I support his discuss
and comments.  In particular, I'd like to see text int he security
considerations about sending traffic to the wrong host and how that is
prevented as well as risks.  Stephen hits on this in his comments and I'd
like to see it addressed in the security considerations section.  Since
that's the point of the draft (multiple hosts using the same IPs), it is
a major consideration.