Re: [dhcwg] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on draft-ietf-dhc-dynamic-shared-v4allocation-07: (with COMMENT)

[Kathleen Moriarty <[e-mail]>]

Sent from my iPhone

> On May 27, 2015, at 11:11 PM, Ted Lemon <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
>> On May 27, 2015, at 7:39 PM, Kathleen Moriarty <[e-mail]> wrote:
>> I have many of the same questions as Stephen, so I support his discuss
>> and comments.  In particular, I'd like to see text int he security
>> considerations about sending traffic to the wrong host and how that is
>> prevented as well as risks.  Stephen hits on this in his comments and I'd
>> like to see it addressed in the security considerations section.  Since
>> that's the point of the draft (multiple hosts using the same IPs), it is
>> a major consideration.
> 
> If you are concerned about this, the time to have objected would have been when A+P got standardized a few months ago. There is no way to address that concern in this document, which is just about configuring A+P clients. FWIW it was talked about and, I think, addressed adequately in the base specifications.

Thanks, Ted.  I didn't see a reference from the Security Considerations section.  If that's all that is needed, let's add it.  I'll look at the base spec.

Thanks,
Kathleen