Re: [dhcwg] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dhc-addr-notification-08.txt

On Thu, Jan 18, 2024, 11:14 Li HUANG <bleuoisou@gmail.com> wrote:

> Host(s) add. most critical even from the top anti or, DB anywhere holders.
>
> Event view 63,  1000 ...alerts Microsoft *,see attaching x2 that over
> limited* .
>
> On Thu, Jan 18, 2024, 01:14 Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
> wrote:
>
>>
>> }           If revealing other hosts addresses and
>> }          alllowing onlink peer-to-peer communication is undesirable for
>> a
>> }          given network segment, then layer2 (link-layer) isolation
>> shall be
>> }          used.
>>
>> I think you'll get a BCP14 query on "shall" here from the IESG.
>> (And I hate putting BCP14 into Security Considerations, so upcasing that
>> would not be my choice)
>>
>> Is there a document that already says this?   Can we just write:
>>
>> }           If revealing other hosts addresses and
>> }          alllowing onlink peer-to-peer communication is undesirable for
>> a
>> }          given network segment, then the recommendations of [RFCXXXX]
>> apply.
>>
>> --
>> Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting
>> )
>>            Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> dhcwg mailing list
>> dhcwg@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg
>>
>