Re: [dhcwg] status of draft-ietf-dhc-agent-subnet-selection

Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com> Tue, 08 October 2002 19:51 UTC

Received: from www1.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id PAA28585 for <dhcwg-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Tue, 8 Oct 2002 15:51:14 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from mailnull@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g98JqqU26801 for dhcwg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Tue, 8 Oct 2002 15:52:52 -0400
Received: from ietf.org (odin.ietf.org [132.151.1.176]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g98Jqqv26798 for <dhcwg-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org>; Tue, 8 Oct 2002 15:52:52 -0400
Received: from www1.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id PAA28571 for <dhcwg-web-archive@ietf.org>; Tue, 8 Oct 2002 15:50:43 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from www1.ietf.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g98Jo2v26671; Tue, 8 Oct 2002 15:50:02 -0400
Received: from ietf.org (odin.ietf.org [132.151.1.176]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g98Jn7v26639 for <dhcwg@optimus.ietf.org>; Tue, 8 Oct 2002 15:49:07 -0400
Received: from toccata.fugue.com (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id PAA28407 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 8 Oct 2002 15:46:57 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from nominum.com (dsl-64-193-175-153.telocity.com [64.193.175.153]) by toccata.fugue.com (8.11.6/8.6.11) with ESMTP id g98Jc6202546; Tue, 8 Oct 2002 14:38:06 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2002 14:49:00 -0500
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] status of draft-ietf-dhc-agent-subnet-selection
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v546)
Cc: dhcwg@ietf.org, Kim Kinnear <kkinnear@cisco.com>, "Bernie Volz (EUD)" <Bernie.Volz@am1.ericsson.se>, Thomas Narten <narten@us.ibm.com>
To: Ralph Droms <rdroms@cisco.com>
From: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
In-Reply-To: <4.3.2.7.2.20021008151605.00b72388@funnel.cisco.com>
Message-Id: <FD5422D2-DAF6-11D6-A9B4-00039367340A@nominum.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.546)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

> Of course, IPsec may be problematic if there are multiple relay agents 
> in the path - which is the problem Mark Stapp is trying to solve, 
> right?

Still not a problem, technically.   You just have one security 
association for each DHCP agent pair, so if you have a double relay, 
you have two security associations.


_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list
dhcwg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg