Re: [dhcwg] Follow up from IETF-95 - draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-prefix-length-hint-issue

I think it's normative.

On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 12:45 PM, Bernie Volz (volz) <volz@cisco.com> wrote:

> Hi:
>
>
>
> One item that was raised at the IETF-95 DHC WG session was the recent
> change (suggested by me before
> draft-cui-dhc-dhcpv6-prefix-length-hint-issue-02 was published) to switch
> draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-prefix-length-hint-issue to Informational rather than
> Standards Track. Marcin Siodelski suggested that the document be Standards
> Track:
>
>
>
> The brief (draft) minutes for this discuss are:
>
>
>
> ---
>
> 5. DHCPv6 Prefix Length Hint Issues, Bernie Volz (for Tianxiang Li) - 10
> minutes, 14:50
>
>     draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-prefix-length-hint-issue
>
>
>
>     The authors believe work is ready for WGLC.
>
>
>
>     Ian: Is this now informational? "This is the suggested way to do it"?
>
>     Bernie: Correct. There were some discussions and the conclusion was to
> not
>
>        enforce it.
>
>     Marcin (on jabber): I'd suggest this is standards track doc with
> normative language
>
>        in. Otherwise implementations will ignore hints.
>
> ---
>
>
>
> Once we resolve this open question (and after a possible update to the
> document), we intend to start a WGLC on the document.
>
>
>
> Please respond with your comments as to whether this document should be
> Informational or Standards Track by May 5th, 2016. Of course, any other
> comments are welcome as well!
>
>
>
> Thanks!
>
>
>
> -          Tomek & Bernie
>
> _______________________________________________
> dhcwg mailing list
> dhcwg@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg
>
>