Re: [dhcwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-relay-id-suboption-09.txt
Prashanth R <prashanth.r@gmail.com> Wed, 25 January 2012 11:17 UTC
Return-Path: <prashanth.r@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FC1421F85ED for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 03:17:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ry4wMnIBY8MR for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 03:17:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pw0-f44.google.com (mail-pw0-f44.google.com [209.85.160.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2807A21F85E5 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 03:17:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: by pbbb11 with SMTP id b11so2057220pbb.31 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 03:17:34 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=z1fXqD1cgHyO6scrL/HFcDCCZOthkpLYsf9DwoN0M2Q=; b=XK6rKQ+4MKJc+AiSAhLHvfnJ8Q/cJtpwBneO73U8sUW8oeqIKvjsYuz3q9WkgV/d9a eoOwdlN64Cwy2vQjXr22hBxzg8O1BltFE2sGiDs9aIehwnMWlvD721CHd00AZdI5qAxn jlLF/Z1J3IfwD7UiRlfz0SZkCH575BBQOEdUE=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.68.130.228 with SMTP id oh4mr15487081pbb.20.1327490254862; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 03:17:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.142.249.35 with HTTP; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 03:17:34 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <AB760FBDB8F14D4294F596941D2CABA92B69EE23F5@BLRKECMBX03.ad.infosys.com>
References: <27E2BF10-7AEE-4B64-B04A-87708CB02C00@fugue.com> <CAAb1YU-kL32rBjKWSgG6VUZ1HFQc9yw55P9NEZF=giWwS0gTEw@mail.gmail.com> <AB760FBDB8F14D4294F596941D2CABA92B69EE23F5@BLRKECMBX03.ad.infosys.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 16:47:34 +0530
Message-ID: <CAE1i8JsuUwzSXtPvuSWk3GV9MgtBqXWbrSmGB7NHw=T8FRUG4Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Prashanth R <prashanth.r@gmail.com>
To: dhc WG <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7b10c8d5157b5204b7586969"
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-relay-id-suboption-09.txt
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 11:17:36 -0000
I have read through and reviewed the draft. I support it moving forward. - Prashanth. > On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 2:17 PM, Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com<mailto: > mellon@fugue.com>> wrote: > This is a pretty brief document that defines a relay agent identifier that > can be sent in option 82. It's been through WGLC and sent to the IESG > once, but the author was unable to respond to IESG comments, so it got > dropped. Bharat Joshi took it over back in June and has updated it and > requested comment. > > We didn't hear any comment on the mailing list. I've read the draft and > it looks reasonable, but I'd like to see more review, so I'm doing this > last call in hopes that someone will take the time to look at the document. > Because of the Christmas and New Years' holidays that some participants > will be celebrating, we won't call consensus on this until January 5. > > If you think this document is useful and should be published, please say > so. If you don't think it should be published, please say so. If you > haven't read the document, please don't express an opinion about it. > > Thanks! > > _______________________________________________ > dhcwg mailing list > dhcwg@ietf.org<mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg > > > **************** CAUTION - Disclaimer ***************** > This e-mail contains PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION intended > solely > for the use of the addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, > please > notify the sender by e-mail and delete the original message. Further, you > are not > to copy, disclose, or distribute this e-mail or its contents to any other > person and > any such actions are unlawful. This e-mail may contain viruses. Infosys > has taken > every reasonable precaution to minimize this risk, but is not liable for > any damage > you may sustain as a result of any virus in this e-mail. You should carry > out your > own virus checks before opening the e-mail or attachment. Infosys reserves > the > right to monitor and review the content of all messages sent to or from > this e-mail > address. Messages sent to or from this e-mail address may be stored on the > Infosys e-mail system. > ***INFOSYS******** End of Disclaimer ********INFOSYS*** > _______________________________________________ > dhcwg mailing list > dhcwg@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg >
- [dhcwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-relay-id-suboption-0… Ted Lemon
- Re: [dhcwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-relay-id-subopti… Bharat Joshi
- Re: [dhcwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-relay-id-subopti… RAMAKRISHNADTV
- Re: [dhcwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-relay-id-subopti… Pavan Kurapati
- Re: [dhcwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-relay-id-subopti… Mukund Kamath
- Re: [dhcwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-relay-id-subopti… Prashanth R
- Re: [dhcwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-relay-id-subopti… Shankari Vaidyalingam
- Re: [dhcwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-relay-id-subopti… Bharat Joshi
- Re: [dhcwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-relay-id-subopti… Ted Lemon
- Re: [dhcwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-relay-id-subopti… Bharat Joshi