Re: [dhcwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-relay-id-suboption-09.txt

Pavan Kurapati <pavan.kurapati@gmail.com> Tue, 24 January 2012 12:41 UTC

Return-Path: <pavan.kurapati@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2027321F8565 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 04:41:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ORo10Pgknb8I for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 04:41:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-vx0-f172.google.com (mail-vx0-f172.google.com [209.85.220.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72F8B21F8562 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 04:41:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: by vcbfk14 with SMTP id fk14so2924661vcb.31 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 04:41:12 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=6uAJ9iFCiUqdCeB0zB5Tr2NByUfLhJKQhMkK3nlwyUE=; b=NnzToH4rLVxZEquj/S9NIZbaesYrk8Wc0BcP08e95yMxC3wm9nUc5WIY4/itaN3+Mz /Je5qbQzuO23ZhOjHqzIMLUssxXNtUpBMKS+SP9TQszJLZrl+vu7g9Y/WpJFPyXlRVLX ZKg7G8jFxWvjPSS8ZB5numVFh3Xi8PsqalscU=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.220.142.84 with SMTP id p20mr6945784vcu.19.1327408871261; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 04:41:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.52.27.108 with HTTP; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 04:41:11 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <27E2BF10-7AEE-4B64-B04A-87708CB02C00@fugue.com>
References: <27E2BF10-7AEE-4B64-B04A-87708CB02C00@fugue.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 07:41:11 -0500
Message-ID: <CAAb1YU-kL32rBjKWSgG6VUZ1HFQc9yw55P9NEZF=giWwS0gTEw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Pavan Kurapati <pavan.kurapati@gmail.com>
To: dhc WG <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f46d043c7aec3e473904b745762b"
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-relay-id-suboption-09.txt
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 12:41:14 -0000

I read the draft and I support it moving forward.

Thanks,
Pavan

On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 2:17 PM, Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> wrote:

> This is a pretty brief document that defines a relay agent identifier that
> can be sent in option 82.   It's been through WGLC and sent to the IESG
> once, but the author was unable to respond to IESG comments, so it got
> dropped.   Bharat Joshi took it over back in June and has updated it and
> requested comment.
>
> We didn't hear any comment on the mailing list.   I've read the draft and
> it looks reasonable, but I'd like to see more review, so I'm doing this
> last call in hopes that someone will take the time to look at the document.
>   Because of the Christmas and New Years' holidays that some participants
> will be celebrating, we won't call consensus on this until January 5.
>
> If you think this document is useful and should be published, please say
> so.   If you don't think it should be published, please say so.   If you
> haven't read the document, please don't express an opinion about it.
>
> Thanks!
>
> _______________________________________________
> dhcwg mailing list
> dhcwg@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg
>