IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dhcwg] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-pd-relay-requirements-04

Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in> Thu, 17 December 2020 02:37 UTC

Return-Path: <alissa@cooperw.in>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE5713A1398; Wed, 16 Dec 2020 18:37:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=cooperw.in header.b=mvuMh6CL; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=I1NNMz9n
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XO0jbZQMla9U; Wed, 16 Dec 2020 18:37:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 531B13A139B; Wed, 16 Dec 2020 18:37:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 422155C00D0; Wed, 16 Dec 2020 21:37:13 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 16 Dec 2020 21:37:13 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cooperw.in; h= content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; s=fm1; bh=K doLDKT7uk6JIanrc525wTmZqCCMShN2P8eZ/MPci1c=; b=mvuMh6CLJ2cQsziFm 061r0bui0iteypuU8kBG1+i63lIlVTm+2AFNJHnDZ1tBVoEG9WDAp3fjgblV62JN b5OEIngVKYWueWZOXU2hkR0LrO9SPTbKzXuF0iY3OnCHwzs2BLCtfFNKsGceIoIN tGyd6K4GX/v7yMnN2dPtQ1LJ1VOnRw+GPv2BGQY7FkbkdEOKDSbU9t4dZE5rphhE T6DBEj5OGceyyv9wtsabxWlJvew/G+0DUwPaa2kv/yFcMn0uEYjJrr7eSE5f3doA qXXDFud/Kx5WdrcMTyiQTzpcQE9bVT98ypNNIr1uc1aPiOuD1+78pQMwiPrDLeAt DKAAw==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=KdoLDKT7uk6JIanrc525wTmZqCCMShN2P8eZ/MPci 1c=; b=I1NNMz9n8ukynZJjRd7O2SQG65Kk2/CY1OqfpetOk5PLy1bHdfSzkyIud 5Et23n2D90Ja8k/Tw8YKQ/xPkzKmF9f/Fu9pe8WVneICM3ZnRWdXb5HvIoLkFqq+ kmkuo1rEWuIM0sodnngDzCyWdbJyyrPGEOtU0koOWNd8RhLKAMydaxSE4CLbmHQO D6n08QoXTbqpDlC1zQIFySkc7wAFU537r/ilsuUgS4ZYzc0wFYRkegLhvnoc7T42 XM5g48dcyJEDppxU9CdLuIn0Qofin3fCWqZJmL55Ji3scwuVCnEWiQE0G0iRY6jf b9tY1vaGubgL3/YX6B9o+afbKBnkw==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:WMTaX3gD7TtWN5M7W6_iJWx7isMP3ZMlX4hJs6SLVVQc3Od2c7DcxQ> <xme:WMTaX0Bmnv8k77o9UvtTzEhvZoVcZtfTeC98NbTIVTYEv0ZHA98LAozRMmHUOLt5n wRu-O5TXhZ_Zu9zog>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedujedrudelfedggeelucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurheptggguffhjgffgffkfhfvofesthhqmhdthhdtjeenucfhrhhomheptehlihhs shgrucevohhophgvrhcuoegrlhhishhsrgestghoohhpvghrfidrihhnqeenucggtffrrg htthgvrhhnpefguedtkeethfekleehheethedvkeektedtvddvjefghfeikeffgeegveef ueegtdenucffohhmrghinhepihgvthhfrdhorhhgnecukfhppedujeefrdefkedrudduje drledunecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhep rghlihhsshgrsegtohhophgvrhifrdhinh
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:WMTaX3Fhr-A952O5rXs-QA8WRAN2JvX2n20UU2nt5D3zu82xZ4kJqQ> <xmx:WMTaX0RvR1N4vYU5BVOnzG6mjYZZZrDaYLq4afzITbkeyjJXnpdIIQ> <xmx:WMTaX0w8VWq3AuiG8_CNa_8hFygAf8JTdIJco0LDy5vxka8g3kWMVw> <xmx:WcTaXw8eyvRMin6IG8rBTkX9LClnl5WAiBgRNFGxfNuCbYgsHM1hAg>
Received: from rtp-vpn4-1171.cisco.com (unknown [173.38.117.91]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 9CB5924005B; Wed, 16 Dec 2020 21:37:12 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.4\))
From: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>
In-Reply-To: <92AF6BB5-5FC0-420C-855B-F9FB50A78C62@gmx.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2020 21:37:12 -0500
Cc: dhcwg@ietf.org, General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-pd-relay-requirements.all@ietf.org, Last Call <last-call@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <A85C32CA-2ACE-4204-BF63-3DA418CA8CA6@cooperw.in>
References: <160778789655.8618.14458453067077361976@ietfa.amsl.com> <92AF6BB5-5FC0-420C-855B-F9FB50A78C62@gmx.com>
To: ianfarrer@gmx.com, Roni Even <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.4)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/lBPStVsM9xYCYJ08zygb3Ztsy2I>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-pd-relay-requirements-04
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2020 02:37:35 -0000

Roni, thanks for your review. Ian, thanks for your response. I entered a No Objection ballot.

Alissa


> On Dec 14, 2020, at 11:45 AM, ianfarrer@gmx.com wrote:
> 
> HI Ron,
> 
> Thanks for the review and comments.  Please see inline below.
> 
> Ian
> 
>> On 12. Dec 2020, at 16:44, Roni Even via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> wrote:
>> 
>> Reviewer: Roni Even
>> Review result: Ready with Nits
>> 
>> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
>> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
>> by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
>> like any other last call comments.
>> 
>> For more information, please see the FAQ at
>> 
>> <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
>> 
>> Document: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-pd-relay-requirements-??
>> Reviewer: Roni Even
>> Review Date: 2020-12-12
>> IETF LC End Date: 2020-12-14
>> IESG Telechat date: 2020-12-17
>> 
>> Summary: The document is ready for publication with nits as a standard track RFC
>> 
>> Major issues:
>> 
>> Minor issues:
>> 
>> Nits/editorial comments:
>> 1. first sentence in section  3.5 "If the client loses information about a
>> prefix that it is delegated ..." not clear "it is”
> 
> [if - Suggested reword:
> 
> If the client loses information about an an active prefix lease it has been delegated...
> 
> ]
> 
>> 2. section 7 "This document
>> does not add any new security considerations beyond those mentioned in Section
>> 22 of [RFC8213]." RFC8213 does not have section 22 , did you mean of RFC8415?
> 
> [if - RFC8213 is correct. The draft has been updated just to reference RFC8213, rather than
> any specific section as the whole document is relevant.]
> 
>> 
>> 3.  In section 7 are there any security requirements for the operational
>> interface requirements from section 4.4?
> 
> [if -  Good point. How about adding a reference recommending that RFC4778 (Current Operational Security Practices in             
> Internet Service Provider Environments) is implemented?]
> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> dhcwg mailing list
>> dhcwg@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gen-art mailing list
> Gen-art@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email