IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dhcwg] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-pd-relay-requirements-04: (with COMMENT)

Naveen Kottapalli <naveen.sarma@gmail.com> Wed, 16 December 2020 07:44 UTC

Return-Path: <naveen.sarma@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 768193A10AB; Tue, 15 Dec 2020 23:44:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bhx_8TVSw_tw; Tue, 15 Dec 2020 23:44:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-io1-xd34.google.com (mail-io1-xd34.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d34]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F08853A10B1; Tue, 15 Dec 2020 23:44:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-io1-xd34.google.com with SMTP id i18so23076145ioa.1; Tue, 15 Dec 2020 23:44:52 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=nUB3CppnkDCQaDmOSY7vF436/hE/JCP8S71Va5B5PFo=; b=WhQbLbLZr9G7dDQd4qjEjeERuHdOKMrFhvtZI2j8ZeXrDIwDoHJV0B7tMo7GD1W75i 3tuLKypOHAQBx7M+Vk68LVeC4kbeWI72IndHDRiU2GhCa0THd+I+F2/QYVLg/C0M32yu VFbhkTFrQwvabiNZ08xjoZUViYV8s6fi/f5d3sv3zo7Ehu0+tPe5QAaJRS7wVcvs5LPg CCMWfucuyEJu6DGvHRMvYSZ2sZ72My3D24ZRyiOs4f/tQk70vp7kg+2iaviUqf4gd4tH J5IYOHO5+LI0lNkOSjduZ2dY56/i6FY9jmfzFt0o6/QrZp1gpVytiFcHUDU2lCyv484W ST7Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=nUB3CppnkDCQaDmOSY7vF436/hE/JCP8S71Va5B5PFo=; b=pFOIzvcGYq2/yVbFmOxTm9oAjJKn+y5/SjEqMBo1kjN5T7/cVHfYqRkqzB/ikVxyGd xIo1Qst1zxey2vr6qokxVRqjv+pSYj833Lc9cWPbHL0cb+twFG+5BBi/hQAWlnd/VNjq xU7hXL5KNTmCg+aXVynub99/Hmc/135iWLciwjVb541D9ppN+0W4A/T9krr0SDMkVVaS u9tVRlIfI8WZ73rpywm4SLRqK+B/m66kAqqwY6mNmd4bDfmhkp5T/3TiNLS967vIKjrL PQeO4mHDXJVUrBoHlsTNNn7yoRN6Jw8rYAdDPUVCUKM4bO2UC8NUM9cqSi0jXkY4AcQV 7FCw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531gBr/V4Cw/Da6FQ9Kh9M/6TsYUhpAcUygweGU7Q2NqhCQv5qv3 UHpm+5QRqyih8LIbFw2G/Tq7G2YHoGbUYtQDN6M=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzmRPJXig6qaeBf4xz1dAaXK2kRSk5Gxjd7l+ijL/Sx+W8mhDA00hchkqyR+t+8nIK1Tpjy1mmtGaS9k2LDbGQ=
X-Received: by 2002:a02:b02:: with SMTP id 2mr42125248jad.15.1608104692179; Tue, 15 Dec 2020 23:44:52 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <160809713483.19962.2154242862609236162@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <160809713483.19962.2154242862609236162@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Naveen Kottapalli <naveen.sarma@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2020 13:14:41 +0530
Message-ID: <CANFmOt=eB3sMO73zSoGb_jrcyYWVZa+tVbEt6F9uWjWQs+3Jew@mail.gmail.com>
To: Murray Kucherawy <superuser@gmail.com>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-pd-relay-requirements@ietf.org, dhc-chairs@ietf.org, dhcwg@ietf.org, Bernie Volz <volz@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000f06a7205b6900c01"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/mo2RTe4NZ4eWxeLdquX8iwsmpUM>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-pd-relay-requirements-04: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2020 07:44:57 -0000

Hello,

Thank you for the comments.  Both the comments are taken care of and will
be seen in the upcoming version of document.

Yours,
Naveen.


On Wed, 16 Dec 2020 at 11:08, Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker <
noreply@ietf.org> wrote:

> Murray Kucherawy has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-pd-relay-requirements-04: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-pd-relay-requirements/
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> In the Abstract the term "memo" is used, but everywhere else it's called a
> "document".  I suggest updating the Abstract to conform.
>
> In Section 2.1: "... forwarding DHCPv6 messages containing IA_PD/IAPREFIX
> ..."
> -- Just to confirm, does that "/" mean "or"?
>
>
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email