Re[2]: [dhcwg] Lease database storage in DHCPv6

Ralph Droms <rdroms@cisco.com> Tue, 30 October 2001 12:50 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id HAA26461 for <dhcwg-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Oct 2001 07:50:05 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from daemon@localhost) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) id HAA28048 for dhcwg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Tue, 30 Oct 2001 07:50:08 -0500 (EST)
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id HAA27320; Tue, 30 Oct 2001 07:24:32 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf.org (odin [132.151.1.176]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id HAA27293 for <dhcwg@optimus.ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Oct 2001 07:24:30 -0500 (EST)
Received: from funnel.cisco.com (funnel.cisco.com [161.44.168.79]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id HAA25365 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Oct 2001 07:24:27 -0500 (EST)
Received: from rdroms-w2k.cisco.com (rtp-vpn1-197.cisco.com [10.82.224.197]) by funnel.cisco.com (8.8.5-Cisco.1/8.6.5) with ESMTP id HAA02118; Tue, 30 Oct 2001 07:23:57 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20011030060452.031e3e80@funnel.cisco.com>
X-Sender: rdroms@funnel.cisco.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.2
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2001 06:05:55 -0500
To: steve <steve@relicore.com>, DHCWG List <dhcwg@ietf.org>
From: Ralph Droms <rdroms@cisco.com>
Subject: Re[2]: [dhcwg] Lease database storage in DHCPv6
In-Reply-To: <1139225695.20011029184313@3miasto.net>
References: <000201c16094$5e8bc890$3500000a@relicore.com> <000201c16094$5e8bc890$3500000a@relicore.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Sender: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 1.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org

BTW, draft-ietf-dhc-pv4-reconfigure-06.txt has been accepted as
a draft standard, and will be published as an RFC soon.

- Ralph

At 06:43 PM 10/29/2001 +0100, Artur Guja wrote:
>Hello steve,
>
>Monday, October 29, 2001, 5:11:28 PM, you wrote:
>
>s> In dhcp v4, there is no standard way for a server to reconfigure
>s> a client. The protocol is designed so that it is always the client
>s> who has to obtain or renew the lease.
>s> Mind you , there has been some proposals to do this, but
>s> AFAIK no RFC.





_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list
dhcwg@ietf.org
http://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg