Re: [dhcwg] Q for draft-krishnan-dhc-ndc-option-00

Hi Daniel,

Daniel Park wrote:
> one approach is not to define *Prefix Information* in your document and goes

It is not clear to me what you mean here.I am pretty sure that I have 
not defined prefix information in the document. My goal is to avoid the 
exact thing you are pointing out: use two incompatible ways to do the 
same thing. I think this draft is something that will help us go in that 
direction (i.e. standardize configuration options only once).

> to others ND optional information. Although it seems admin issue, I don't
> think we need to have a redundant method for getting *Prefix Information*...
> RFC3633 lives up to *IPv6 Prefix Configuration*.

For existing DHCP and ND options that are already duplicated (prefixes, 
DNS...): Well, that ship has sailed, and it is upto admin policy to set 
the precedence as I said in my earlier mail. If you think a technical 
solution is possible, I would be interested in learning about it.

Thanks
Suresh

_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list
dhcwg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg