Re: [dhcwg] WGLC for draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-failover-design-03 -
gvithal <gvithal@gmail.com> Fri, 26 July 2013 17:48 UTC
Return-Path: <gvithal@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF99A21F8756 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Jul 2013 10:48:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id d+K0kBSAKxsH for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Jul 2013 10:48:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wg0-x230.google.com (mail-wg0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::230]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2687311E8114 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Jul 2013 10:48:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wg0-f48.google.com with SMTP id f12so2473917wgh.15 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Jul 2013 10:48:00 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=5HGrW9tewqM/OGJ44gYhq2AZZQFG+6r0YZMc3bfDIjc=; b=uWv7dikKk7tCgitH3f/emvMi30NUk5zcbQDeokD7JUC4GCyv332Yrsj5MNEKmRRDOJ QCj/qQXWePQOJkDOefA+K1QHqUVqrrqXvhWLO2oz6uuEKufC7rban888HMwFgVZQE+gC 4AFvknCwwRXiZ//sbph3vTFY50bbqqOAIsa970dTcaRze9e62U+clCgOyI8t5P41pCmd IB2c/CYi5gdI+UFj0r5XXF6PRyX/0WsFdgHnsxwjbaPRlPlk7J4HtWiDEMcPFeoeK73T BfZRhY8GaSjs+EMmV+Z8SKGcp4KMG7McYzsRtxgFdhRkme9hfCc4wnd88kZharFEYzp6 gF3A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=5HGrW9tewqM/OGJ44gYhq2AZZQFG+6r0YZMc3bfDIjc=; b=Oe6z+2aKlqbTYB1cwRQHljM6paw+YCzq4wuyDfPRL0LQ4mQpK1Kcu63MIhoxZCIKLd vCta2CHmqBvYLygyqaAW7ahID/XWRG4dWhA+rti7IitAxt1WAne1OpfiM5cQkQGwHCCN 2paLCgcO9oacQ4MFSLD6TQ2NkUVHri4X+LNCZAV3j5uK2dg0X66v7pFBFk2Qs65J1gcy GZC7VIybE2D0CeBecsJzrjWxdM2InPThUVoHXMGE5dTFMrKNlhw1X4aeId29egeARo8G y2JdbDUp4LqGU54RRmaDnladIjf4M1F/PZfFTSUGLekZtlCMQrIgbijnIXUqtdvjHHsp gjZA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.101.170 with SMTP id fh10mr6490088wib.22.1374860880235; Fri, 26 Jul 2013 10:48:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: gvithal <gvithal@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2013 10:48:00 -0700
Message-ID: <-1990358364323232564@unknownmsgid>
To: "sthaug@nethelp.no" <sthaug@nethelp.no>, "stenc@s-carlsen.dk" <stenc@s-carlsen.dk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Cc: "dhcwg@ietf.org" <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] WGLC for draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-failover-design-03 -
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2013 17:48:04 -0000
Respond by August 9, 2013! MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Same here. I have reviewed earlier versions of this document. DHCPv6 failover is definitely required and I am support the WG taking this up. Sent from my Windows Phone From: sthaug@nethelp.no Sent: =E2=80=8E7/=E2=80=8E26/=E2=80=8E2013 22:28 To: stenc@s-carlsen.dk Cc: dhcwg@ietf.org Subject: Re: [dhcwg] WGLC for draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-failover-design-03 - Respond by August 9, 2013! > I have not had the time to read the proposal yet, I believe it is useful > to have failover available for larger installations. >=20 > So, please don't drop it. Same thing here. I'm on vacation with rather poor Internet access (happens to be the U.S., but that's another discussion). I'm very definitely interested in this draft. Steinar Haug, AS 2116 >=20 > On 26/07/13 17:42, Tomek Mrugalski wrote: > > On 19.07.2013 15:59, Bernie Volz (volz) wrote: > >> Folks, the authors of draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-failover-design-03 > >> (http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-failover-design) > >> believe it is ready for working group last call. Please review this > >> draft and indicate whether or not you feel it is ready to be published= . > >> Your input is important! > > I support this work moving forward. It doesn't count much, as I'm co-au= thor. > > > > I'm somewhat disappointed with the complete lack of any comments. When > > we started the work on v6 failover, there was exactly 20 people > > expressing their interest in this work that wanted to join the the > > effort. A year and a half passed and now there seems to be noone to eve= n > > say "yeah, it's ok". > > > > A week has passed for this WGLC already. WGLC will end in 2 weeks, so > > there's still plenty of time for a through review. If you want to have > > v6 failover, respond. Make no mistake - without sufficient support, thi= s > > work will fail WGLC. > > > > If you have time - please review it. If you are busy or just don't care > > about the details, saying that you support this work is useful and you > > want it to move forward is helpful, too. > > > > Tomek > > > > _______________________________________________ > > dhcwg mailing list > > dhcwg@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg >=20 > --=20 > Best regards >=20 > Sten Carlsen >=20 > No improvements come from shouting: >=20 > "MALE BOVINE MANURE!!!"=20 >=20 _______________________________________________ dhcwg mailing list dhcwg@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg