IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dhcwg] applicability of draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-ctep-opt-01

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Mon, 05 April 2004 01:19 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id VAA18502 for <dhcwg-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Sun, 4 Apr 2004 21:19:28 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BAIlQ-0003Yt-Rg for dhcwg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Sun, 04 Apr 2004 21:19:01 -0400
Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i351J0Dc013687 for dhcwg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Sun, 4 Apr 2004 21:19:00 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BAIlQ-0003Yg-GR for dhcwg-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Sun, 04 Apr 2004 21:19:00 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id VAA18470 for <dhcwg-web-archive@ietf.org>; Sun, 4 Apr 2004 21:18:57 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BAIlN-0005Zz-00 for dhcwg-web-archive@ietf.org; Sun, 04 Apr 2004 21:18:58 -0400
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1BAIkU-0005Tt-00 for dhcwg-web-archive@ietf.org; Sun, 04 Apr 2004 21:18:03 -0400
Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BAIjW-0005OH-00 for dhcwg-web-archive@ietf.org; Sun, 04 Apr 2004 21:17:02 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BAIjV-0003Hq-6H; Sun, 04 Apr 2004 21:17:01 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BAIiX-0003EC-BG for dhcwg@optimus.ietf.org; Sun, 04 Apr 2004 21:16:01 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id VAA18364 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Sun, 4 Apr 2004 21:15:58 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BAIiU-0005Hz-00 for dhcwg@ietf.org; Sun, 04 Apr 2004 21:15:58 -0400
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1BAIha-0005D1-00 for dhcwg@ietf.org; Sun, 04 Apr 2004 21:15:03 -0400
Received: from toccata.fugue.com ([204.152.186.142]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BAIhB-000583-00 for dhcwg@ietf.org; Sun, 04 Apr 2004 21:14:37 -0400
Received: from [10.0.1.3] (24-148-56-150.c3-0.snb-ubr1.chi-snb.il.cable.rcn.com [24.148.56.150]) by toccata.fugue.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67FDE1C1292; Sun, 4 Apr 2004 20:08:42 -0500 (CDT)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0404021635270.31390-100000@netcore.fi>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0404021635270.31390-100000@netcore.fi>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v613)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Message-Id: <99C4FAC6-869E-11D8-869D-000A95D9C74C@fugue.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: dhcwg@ietf.org
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] applicability of draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-ctep-opt-01
Date: Sun, 04 Apr 2004 20:14:35 -0500
To: Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.613)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.60
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Apr 2, 2004, at 7:44 AM, Pekka Savola wrote:
> You're trading off having to
> configure 90 tunnels in 10 border routers to having to configure 90
> tunnels in 10 DHCPv6 servers.
>
> IMHO, in this kind of set-up, Using DHCPv6 just doesn't seem to make
> sense.

Possibly it's easier to configure a DHCP server on a central server 
somewhere with all this information rather than configuring the router, 
because if the router dies then you have to remember to reconfigure it. 
   But basically, I don't know.   :')


_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list
dhcwg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email