[dhcwg] Results of WGLC for draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-failover-design-03 - Respond by August 9, 2013!

"Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com> Mon, 26 August 2013 15:46 UTC

Return-Path: <volz@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D1FC11E81C5 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Aug 2013 08:46:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.598
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3Yx+3tJASTFl for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Aug 2013 08:46:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADA2F11E81BC for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Aug 2013 08:46:50 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=15355; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1377532010; x=1378741610; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=76g4WBQcrbDNc7l7N/iQQRb4jkMsK5VNmuqsJ+q7ebA=; b=I+vjD2eWXmg/vNM254u2Qw5oS0hIdRgYKRLvYYsybIygTWAjPGT8BE9U vXj2iWcJzYLWdAoKa17inJz3JUlYfslx/P1NYlr5ROmlmeOLtodhCL5KL nGn3q2tUsKFTu6yvVGaQ+cVtg8qC+j9jpjdcptlZReJFQ4Sy/ppViQ1Lg g=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.89,959,1367971200"; d="scan'208,217"; a="251695479"
Received: from rcdn-core2-3.cisco.com ([]) by rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 26 Aug 2013 15:46:50 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x06.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x06.cisco.com []) by rcdn-core2-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r7QFknq5000570 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Aug 2013 15:46:49 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com ([]) by xhc-rcd-x06.cisco.com ([]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Mon, 26 Aug 2013 10:46:49 -0500
From: "Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com>
To: "dhcwg@ietf.org" <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Results of WGLC for draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-failover-design-03 - Respond by August 9, 2013!
Thread-Index: Ac6icy7/MgcharbVTkOi3dDn+8ixdQ==
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2013 15:46:48 +0000
Message-ID: <489D13FBFA9B3E41812EA89F188F018E186ACE5A@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
x-originating-ip: []
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_489D13FBFA9B3E41812EA89F188F018E186ACE5Axmbrcdx04ciscoc_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: [dhcwg] Results of WGLC for draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-failover-design-03 - Respond by August 9, 2013!
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2013 15:46:58 -0000

Hi ... here's the results of this WGLC:

The WG co-chairs feel this document has WG consensus as there were multiple reviews and responses in favor, and no one objecting to advancing the document. The work also builds on the DHCPv4 failover draft work which had years of discussion and review (though never having been completed). However, as there were nits and some potential substantive clarifications (more on this to come from either Kim or Bernie), it will be prudent to wait until the updated draft is available and give people a week or so to review these changes before advancing.

If you have not yet reviewed the document and your provided input, please use this additional time to provide your comments and support for or objection against advancing the document.

-          Bernie

From: dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Bernie Volz (volz)
Sent: Friday, July 19, 2013 9:59 AM
To: dhcwg@ietf.org
Subject: [dhcwg] WGLC for draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-failover-design-03 - Respond by August 9, 2013!

Folks, the authors of draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-failover-design-03 (http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-failover-design) believe it is ready for working group last call. Please review this draft and indicate whether or not you feel it is ready to be published. Your input is important!

This document is the 2nd series of documents related to DHCPv6 failover - the first is http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-failover-requirements which is currently being reviewed by the IESG for publication approval.

At the time of this writing, there is no IPR reported against this draft.

As Tomek is a co-author, I will primarily evaluate consensus after 2013-08-09 (August 9th). This is a 3 week last call because of the Berlin IETF meeting and also because of summer-time vacations (at least for those of us in the northern hemisphere).


-          Bernie