Re: [dhcwg] Query Regarding DHCP Lease time, Rebind Time and Renewal Time.

Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com> Fri, 22 October 2010 14:59 UTC

Return-Path: <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FE1B28B56A for <dhcwg@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 07:59:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.448
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.448 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.150, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8u30bArGD7zL for <dhcwg@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 07:59:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from exprod7og115.obsmtp.com (exprod7og115.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.217]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7DB43A6934 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 07:59:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from source ([64.89.228.229]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob115.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKTMGnLbJ3ZxUj2Ic2LtfiEjcQCfkBG8dk@postini.com; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 08:01:02 PDT
Received: from webmail.nominum.com (webmail.nominum.com [64.89.228.50]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "webmail.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by shell-too.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D68B61B8392; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 08:01:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.1.10.17] (173.162.214.218) by exchange-01.win.nominum.com (64.89.228.50) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.2.176.0; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 08:01:00 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail-1-214814392"
From: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=4nuZdX2DTziF4PwQLYnu_x9qSKVqnoyJdoGdX@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 11:00:59 -0400
Message-ID: <ED45FAFE-87D5-4EA2-ACF5-9C8D5E71BE97@nominum.com>
References: <AANLkTi=Kq5k5NmtLT17OEXk87T+=FA9X8jr_Hc=u5kX-@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTi=4nuZdX2DTziF4PwQLYnu_x9qSKVqnoyJdoGdX@mail.gmail.com>
To: Bud Millwood <budmillwood@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081)
Cc: "dhcwg@ietf.org" <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] Query Regarding DHCP Lease time, Rebind Time and Renewal Time.
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 14:59:32 -0000

On Oct 22, 2010, at 5:55 AM, Bud Millwood wrote:
> If the lease length is 0, then nothing about the offer is valid at all, IMO, and it should be discarded.

That's right.   If you try to process it, you will flood the network.