IETF Logo Mail Archive

[dhcwg] Query Regarding DHCP Lease time, Rebind Time and Renewal Time.

Ramesh Ganapathi <rameshganapathi@gmail.com> Fri, 22 October 2010 06:19 UTC

Return-Path: <rameshganapathi@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DD6C3A67F0 for <dhcwg@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 23:19:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id n+Tu9cRVfvcu for <dhcwg@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 23:19:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-iw0-f172.google.com (mail-iw0-f172.google.com [209.85.214.172]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 904D93A67EC for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 23:19:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by iwn5 with SMTP id 5so600208iwn.31 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 23:20:57 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=5Usbe+R6JPddj0x0bWhzFno9XnmOj0zGFa61HSGwnyo=; b=DvRc6JQe08FjlG3cB8wuJnb1Q8vCROdd9Lne5+sRFsvu6GMSyW5zP0flQ0OhNWUPcF MkHKIxRKn+dzN9GPkUg5iaLfUgzncTBBVW4gB2mvc/BP3VN/QSVf3yrXc2jGLGc2ErYe ilIjKr0xIrnQL7Ogl7y/6JEz2a8H4Ih9/y3uE=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=hQq0aP92on6r20hSqMc8J1H7whxSKJg9Vknael7BD7XcFTjfL/Z92Mra7TQ/UuFwvl L6iXlyxe6TDiY5HEwf3Xum34RhSy4yRmFxW7E6IzFI0d5aOPd8LG5tkM+u5YIlP1ZUeX O8fOOGQlHaZMTpEogCOYtfGnEAswB1JSULJCM=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.231.35.200 with SMTP id q8mr1910357ibd.191.1287728457629; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 23:20:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.231.199.5 with HTTP; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 23:20:57 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 11:50:57 +0530
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=Kq5k5NmtLT17OEXk87T+=FA9X8jr_Hc=u5kX-@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ramesh Ganapathi <rameshganapathi@gmail.com>
To: dhcwg@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="002215048a4348c24404932ea526"
Subject: [dhcwg] Query Regarding DHCP Lease time, Rebind Time and Renewal Time.
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 06:28:14 -0000

Hi All,

Need clarification regarding the following:



1)     What should be the expected behavior if the DHCP client receiver a
OFFER with lease time of 0(zero).?

2)    If the DHCP Client receives DHCP OFFER with lease timer of 2 seconds
the T1(Rebind Timer) and T2 (Renew Timer) timer value will be round of to 1
second.

T1 = (lease time * 0.5) = 2*0.5 = 1

T2 = (lease time * 0.875) = 2 * 0.875 = 1.75 (round of to 1)

What should be expected behavior if the T1 and T2 timer value are same?



Thank you in Advance.



Warm Regards,

Ramesh.G

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email