[dhcwg] Value in draft-ietf-dhc-stable-privacy-addresses

Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com> Thu, 23 July 2015 12:23 UTC

Return-Path: <fgont@si6networks.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DCA91A0191 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 05:23:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id F-JoVWy8xnBf for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 05:23:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from web01.jbserver.net (web01.jbserver.net [IPv6:2a00:8240:6:a::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 844341A854B for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 05:23:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [2001:67c:370:160:7924:9e61:df1f:7a42] by web01.jbserver.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.85) (envelope-from <fgont@si6networks.com>) id 1ZIFX1-0007k6-Jx; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 14:23:23 +0200
Message-ID: <55B0DC79.3050003@si6networks.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 09:22:17 -0300
From: Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "dhcwg@ietf.org" <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/xMP4t9z0lnOYV9AtTv2915yhclM>
Subject: [dhcwg] Value in draft-ietf-dhc-stable-privacy-addresses
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 12:23:32 -0000

Folks,

During the DHC meeting the question was made regarding what's the value
that this document brings.

1) It is a calculated technique for DHCPv6 failover (as pointed in
RFC7031, but never specified elsewhere).

2) At the same time, it specifies an algorithm for randomizing the IIDs.
Steps 2-5 in Section 4 of draft-ietf-dhc-stable-privacy-addresses need
to be performed no matter what the source of the random IID is (whether
the hash that we employ in our document, or simply "random()").

I wouldn't be surprised at all if implementations fail to perform some
or all of steps 2-5 above if we simply provide a vague "just set the IID
to a random value if you want to avoid privacy issues".


Whether the document continues as Informational or Std Track is, IMHO, a
secondary matter. But I would expect that based on the above, the value
in this document is clear.

Thanks,
-- 
Fernando Gont
SI6 Networks
e-mail: fgont@si6networks.com
PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492