[Diffserv] Re: Informal WG last call for draft-ietf-diffserv-new-terms-06.txt

Officially, this last call expired yesterday, and Dan has collected
a few revisions.

Unfortunately I have to add the following comment after my own
deadline, because it only just came up:

  IANA was slightly confused by the IANA Considerations in RFC 2474,
  while reviewing draft-ietf-diffserv-efresolve-01.txt. RFC 2474
  doesn't say explicitly that *only* standards track DSCP values
  are to be registered by IANA.

  Proposal: Add to the new-terms document:
    When RFC 2474 is revised, the following sentence should be added
    to Section 6, IANA Considerations: "IANA is requested to maintain
    a register of the DSCP values RECOMMENDED by Standards Action;
    EXP/LU values are not to be registered." 

      Brian

Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> 
> It is proposed to forward draft-ietf-diffserv-new-terms-06.txt
> for publication as an Informational RFC. This is an informal
> working group last call - please make any last comments
> on this document by Wednesday, November 21.
> 
> N.B. This is an "informal" call because this is not a
> standards track document. Nevertheless, the clarification
> in Section 7 does refer to standards track issues.
> 
>   Brian Carpenter
>   Kathie Nichols
>    diffserv co-chairs
> 
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: [Diffserv] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-diffserv-new-terms-06.txt
> Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2001 07:04:57 -0500
> From: Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
> Reply-To: Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
> To: IETF-Announce: ;
> CC: diffserv@ietf.org
> 
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
> This draft is a work item of the Differentiated Services Working Group of the IETF.
> 
>         Title           : New Terminology for Diffserv
>         Author(s)       : D. Grossman
>         Filename        : draft-ietf-diffserv-new-terms-06.txt
>         Pages           : 9
>         Date            : 06-Nov-01
> 
> This memo captures Diffserv working group agreements concerning new
> and improved terminology, and also provides minor technical
> clarifications.  It is intended to update RFC 2474, RFC 2475 and RFC
> 2597.   When RFCs 2474 and 2597 advance on the standards track, and
> RFC 2475 is updated, it is intended that the revisions in this memo
> will be incorporated, and that this memo will be obsoleted by the new
> RFCs.
> 
> A URL for this Internet-Draft is:
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-diffserv-new-terms-06.txt

_______________________________________________
diffserv mailing list
diffserv@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/diffserv
Archive: http://www2.ietf.org/mail-archive/working-groups/diffserv/current/maillist.html