Re: [Digitalmap-yang] Draft draft-havel-opsawg-digital-map / draft-havel-nmop-digital-map

[Olga Havel <[e-mail]>]

Hi all,

I merged the comments from Med and Benoit and closed the issues. Thanks for reviewing.

Please from now on modify the draft-havel-nmop-digital-map.md. I kept the draft-havel-opswag-digital-map just for the purpose of doing diff with the old versions before we submit, I will change it based on the md version. That way  it will be easier for us  to see the changes in the ietf tool. It should be the same content except the file name, workgroup and version number.

Please let me know if there are any more comments and if you want me to wait with the submission until Monday. Otherwise, I will submit tomorrow.

Best Regards,
Olga


From: Benoit Claise
Sent: Wednesday 28 February 2024 23:23
To: Olga Havel <[e-mail]>; [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]; Benoit Claise <[e-mail]>
Subject: Re: Draft draft-havel-opsawg-digital-map / draft-havel-nmop-digital-map

Olga,

Good job with the new draft version.
I like your suggestions in section 5.1.x, and the conclusions that all gaps can be solved with a RFC8345 backward compatible solution.

I proposed editorial changes at https://github.com/OlgaHuawei/draft-olga-digital-map/pull/16

Regards, Benoit
On 2/27/2024 1:10 PM, Olga Havel wrote:
Dear All,

I made some updates to the draft-havel-opsawg-digital-map, please see the diff files attached (diff and new version I used for diff).

I also renamed it to draft-havel-nmop-digital-map. I am attaching both files, as I used opsawg for diff

The following are some changes done:

1.      Addressed the following comments from the previous review:

1.      Med comment to move from xml to md. The files draft-havel-opsawg-digital-map.md and  draft-havel-nmop-map.md and corresponding generated txt  added to the github https://github.com/OlgaHuawei/draft-olga-digital-map

2.      Updated capitalized versus not capitalized throughout the document

3.      Some editorial comments

2.      Updated references to the later versions

3.      Changed references to the

4.      Added more info about candidate approaches and the suggestion to start working on RFC8345 bis – see sections 5.1.1, 5.1.2, 5.1.3, 5.1.4, 5.1.5, 5.1.6 and 5.1.7

5.      Section 5.2

1.      Resolved some open issues

2.      Added circular dependencies issues as discussed with Oscar

6.      Added more context to section 5.3 – added quotes of some guidelines from RFC8345 that should be taken into account when agreeing the approach of how to extend model

7.      Added more context to section 5.5 and split it into the 2 subsections

8.      Made some updates in the Section 6.3 that reflect the new ivy draft for network inventory

9.      Updated conclusions to add the proposal to start working on RFC8345 bis

Please authors and contributors, make any changes in the and  draft-havel-nmop-map.md file. My plan is to submit it before the deadline on 4th March, so please update or send any comments prior to that.

Best Regards,
Olga