Re: [Dime] Review of draft-jones-3gpp-eps-command-codes-00

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo)
> [mailto:hannes.tschofenig@nsn.com]
> Sent: December 9, 2008 09:19
> To: Mark Jones; Romascanu, Dan (Dan); Victor Fajardo; dime@ietf.org
> Subject: RE: [Dime] Review of draft-jones-3gpp-eps-command-codes-00
>
> I will do the shepherd.
>

Thanks Hannes. Very much appreciated.

Regards
Mark

>
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: dime-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:dime-bounces@ietf.org] On
> >Behalf Of ext Mark Jones
> >Sent: 09 December, 2008 16:16
> >To: Romascanu, Dan (Dan); Victor Fajardo; dime@ietf.org
> >Subject: Re: [Dime] Review of draft-jones-3gpp-eps-command-codes-00
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: dime-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:dime-bounces@ietf.org]
> On Behalf
> >> Of Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
> >> Sent: December 8, 2008 14:19
> >> To: Mark Jones; Victor Fajardo; dime@ietf.org
> >> Subject: Re: [Dime] Review of draft-jones-3gpp-eps-command-codes-00
> >>
> >> Mark,
> >>
> >> Do not forget that in order to complete the submission process you
> >> need to find a proto-shepherd, and the shepherd needs to submit a
> >> proto write-up.
> >>
> >
> >Understood, Dan. A draft PROTO write-up is being prepared by
> >the authors while we continue the search for a doc shepherd.
> >
> >Thanks
> >Mark
> >
> >
> >
> >> Thanks and Regards,
> >>
> >> Dan
> >>
> >>
> >> > -----Original Message-----
> >> > From: dime-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:dime-bounces@ietf.org]
> >On Behalf
> >> > Of Mark Jones
> >> > Sent: Monday, December 08, 2008 7:06 PM
> >> > To: Victor Fajardo; dime@ietf.org
> >> > Subject: Re: [Dime] Review of
> draft-jones-3gpp-eps-command-codes-00
> >> >
> >> > Thanks for the review, Victor.
> >> >
> >> > Responses/Comments inline. I'll incorporate your changes into the
> >> > -01 version and publish shortly.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > > -----Original Message-----
> >> > > From: Victor Fajardo [mailto:vfajardo@tari.toshiba.com]
> >> > > Sent: December 4, 2008 15:56
> >> > > To: dime@ietf.org; Mark Jones; MORAND Lionel RD-CORE-ISS
> >> > > Subject: Review of draft-jones-3gpp-eps-command-codes-00
> >> > >
> >> > > Hi Mark/Lionel,
> >> > >
> >> > > Comments on draft-jones-3gpp-eps-command-codes-00:
> >> > >
> >> > > * Maybe add the following sentence to the introduction to
> >> > clarify the
> >> > > purpose of the doc:
> >> > >
> >> > > "This document defines the assigned values of the command
> >> > codes used
> >> > > in these applications."
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> > Ok.
> >> >
> >> > >
> >> > > * Change 1st paragraph of Sec 3 from:
> >> > >
> >> > > "As described in [TS29.272], the 3GPP S6a application
> >> specifies the
> >> > >  following command pairs:"
> >> > >
> >> > > to:
> >> > >
> >> > > "3GPP S6a application in [TS29.272] requires the definition
> >> > of command
> >> > > code values for
> >> > >  the following command pairs:"
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> > Ok
> >> >
> >> > >
> >> > > * Change 2nd paragraph of Sec 3 from:
> >> > >
> >> > > "Also described in [TS29.272], the 3GPP S13 application
> >> > specifies the
> >> > >  following command pair:"
> >> > >
> >> > > to:
> >> > >
> >> > > "3GPP S13 application in [TS29.272] requires the
> >definition of the
> >> > > command code values for  the following command pairs:"
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> > Ok
> >> >
> >> > >
> >> > > * Change 2nd paragraph of the IANA considerations from:
> >> > >
> >> > > "This document defines values in the namespaces that have
> >> > been created
> >> > >   and defined in the Diameter Base [RFC3588]. The IANA
> >> > Considerations
> >> > >  section of that document details the assignment criteria.
> >> > Values ..."
> >> > >
> >> > > to:
> >> > >
> >> > > "This document defines values in the namespaces that have
> >> > been created
> >> > >  and defined in Sec 11.2.1 of the Diameter Base
> >> [RFC3588].  Sec 11,
> >> > >  IANA Considerations of [RFC3588] details the assignment
> >criteria.
> >> > >  Values ..."
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> > Ok but would prefer "Section" instead of "Sec".
> >> >
> >> > >
> >> > > * Are the values intended to forward compatible with bis ?
> >> > If so, does
> >> > > it need to
> >> > >   fall in the 0x800000 - 0xfffffd range ? If so, do we need
> >> > to mention
> >> > >   that in the IANA actions (since this is absent in 3588) ?
> >> > >
> >> > > As it is, the document complies with the 3588 command code
> >> > allocation
> >> > > process.
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> > My understanding is that IANA must follow the rules in 3588 until
> >> > 3588bis is ratified. That unfortunately means that the
> >3GPP S6a/S13
> >> > values will be taken from the IETF range as proposed in
> >3588bis but
> >> > I see no means to give any alternative guidance to IANA.
> >> >
> >> > Thanks
> >> > Mark
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > DiME mailing list
> >> > DiME@ietf.org
> >> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime
> >> >
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> DiME mailing list
> >> DiME@ietf.org
> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime
> >>
> >_______________________________________________
> >DiME mailing list
> >DiME@ietf.org
> >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime
> >
>
_______________________________________________
DiME mailing list
DiME@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime