Re: [Dime] Review of draft-jones-3gpp-eps-command-codes-00

"Glen Zorn" <glenzorn@comcast.net> Wed, 10 December 2008 02:01 UTC

Return-Path: <dime-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: dime-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-dime-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 091903A69A3; Tue, 9 Dec 2008 18:01:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: dime@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dime@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F33583A69A3 for <dime@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Dec 2008 18:01:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uTDcDiedxl8X for <dime@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Dec 2008 18:01:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from QMTA07.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net (qmta07.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net [76.96.30.64]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 582503A68D3 for <dime@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Dec 2008 18:01:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from OMTA04.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.35]) by QMTA07.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id pCgy1a00H0lTkoCA7E1f3j; Wed, 10 Dec 2008 02:01:40 +0000
Received: from gwzPC ([124.120.216.170]) by OMTA04.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id pE1J1a00J3h9y908QE1Pph; Wed, 10 Dec 2008 02:01:37 +0000
From: Glen Zorn <glenzorn@comcast.net>
To: "'Romascanu, Dan (Dan)'" <dromasca@avaya.com>
References: <493843D3.1020902@tari.toshiba.com> <EDC652A26FB23C4EB6384A4584434A04011C128F@307622ANEX5.global.avaya.com>
In-Reply-To: <EDC652A26FB23C4EB6384A4584434A04011C128F@307622ANEX5.global.avaya.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 09:00:42 +0700
Message-ID: <000101c95a6b$27e37b70$77aa7250$@net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Thread-Index: AclWUrRa5Z+7ZO3CQvOEVHxrAxjaVgDFqs/QAEBIWrA=
Content-Language: en-us
Cc: dime@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Dime] Review of draft-jones-3gpp-eps-command-codes-00
X-BeenThere: dime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Diameter Maintanence and Extentions Working Group <dime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/dime>
List-Post: <mailto:dime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: dime-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: dime-bounces@ietf.org

> Victor,
> 
> What is your recommendation of behalf of DIME? Assuming that the
> comments you made are resolved is the document at the appropriate
> quality level to be undertaken as an AD-sponsored document?
> 
> Any other opinions from other DIME WG participants?

Actually, I liked the draft better w/o Victor's changes, which in one case
at least introduce linguistic inaccuracy ("3GPP S13 application in
[TS29.272] requires the definition of the command code values for the
following command pairs": there is only one command code pair following).
In any case, the doc looks fine to me.

...

_______________________________________________
DiME mailing list
DiME@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime