IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Dime] DOIC #54: OC-Report-Type as mandatory AVP

Jouni Korhonen <jouni.nospam@gmail.com> Wed, 16 July 2014 22:40 UTC

Return-Path: <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A2111A0380 for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Jul 2014 15:40:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id udeA63yri1xG for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Jul 2014 15:40:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pd0-x22b.google.com (mail-pd0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c02::22b]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C7061A037F for <dime@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Jul 2014 15:40:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pd0-f171.google.com with SMTP id z10so1978280pdj.30 for <dime@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Jul 2014 15:40:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=OOhE3/+wRRJLzux8VE+L8WXhU4fDOHD3HWXPUvD4R4o=; b=X8K95Pqk1eSwMSW/j3ebEKzHgUkZQZIaFsCDrEPq4XzDUmmAQ0/yL1/mKkclv2FE+F wEM/5DmQJizMQW4DCg3H1dFLdGMzfAnkBq9hVfgj7/SV54gGdK810QuVqgFZuRViHGuG U/tsp5wxNeofkMihbJAsO3lO/K4HiNbagulM5NDu0FKovj3zC6mq7/wFF4kGjLvKBK8Q gj/9R5YixIHXG0uqWvvv07WrOCt1xTgowAFf7g8oKv2ZuLRnYCYr06w4heEjrvXqtBY0 JgmAA4oLpcqE2m5+xJDy/g6oMz8t2FyvVVTLzKVlBf4GGwFQDfx3xvbN/6OgahFlrQGI jYGg==
X-Received: by 10.68.251.201 with SMTP id zm9mr33499135pbc.22.1405550446881; Wed, 16 Jul 2014 15:40:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.100.20.19] ([63.133.199.244]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id wp3sm422946pbc.67.2014.07.16.15.40.45 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 16 Jul 2014 15:40:45 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <53C6FF6B.9020605@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2014 01:40:43 +0300
From: Jouni Korhonen <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Steve Donovan <srdonovan@usdonovans.com>, Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
References: <53C6754B.5020600@usdonovans.com> <E7E477E9-DB14-4877-8288-7210BAB49427@nostrum.com> <53C68B45.1020408@usdonovans.com>
In-Reply-To: <53C68B45.1020408@usdonovans.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dime/4CJV_ajh7Q7YfvJHNv1poOsQSUY
Cc: "dime@ietf.org" <dime@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Dime] DOIC #54: OC-Report-Type as mandatory AVP
X-BeenThere: dime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Diameter Maintanence and Extentions Working Group <dime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dime/>
List-Post: <mailto:dime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2014 22:40:49 -0000

Hi,

Lionel declared a rough concensus on #54. This issue should be closed.

- Jouni

7/16/2014 5:25 PM, Steve Donovan kirjoitti:
> You are correct, that is what lead to the current text in the -03
> draft.  There has been an objection raised to the declaration.
>
> Steve
>
> On 7/16/14, 4:18 PM, Ben Campbell wrote:
>> I thought our chairs had declared a rough consensus on this. Do I have
>> that confused with another issue?
>>
>> On Jul 16, 2014, at 7:51 AM, Steve Donovan <srdonovan@usdonovans.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> All,
>>>
>>> Now that the restructure of the DOIC specification is complete we
>>> need to start resolving open issues.  Those that entered the issues
>>> are encouraged to work to get them closed.
>>>
>>> I'll start on #54 in this email.
>>>
>>> The question is whether the OC-Report-Type AVP is required any time
>>> that an OC-OLR AVP is sent.
>>>
>>> The current version of the draft is the same as the -02 version,
>>> showing the AVP as being required.  This was based on an earlier
>>> attempt to close the issue prior to -02 being published.
>>>
>>> Susan has stated that she does not think it should be required.  If I
>>> understand correctly this is based on the assumption that an HSS
>>> would never send an OLR with report-type of any value but host.
>>>
>>> Susan, please correct me if I'm mistaken.
>>>
>>> I don't believe this is a correct assumption.  It is reasonable for
>>> an HSS to send an OLR with report-type of realm.  This might happen
>>> in a non agent based deployment or in a deployment where the HSS (or
>>> more generically, server) has knowledge of the status of all servers
>>> for the application.
>>>
>>> Based on this, I propose that the text be kept as is and that this
>>> issue be closed without changes to the specification.
>>>
>>> The threshold for changing what is currently in the DOIC
>>> specification is rough consensus in the group that it should be
>>> changed.  Anyone with an opinion is encouraged to state it now. This
>>> is not a vote (we don't vote in the IETF...) but an attempt to see if
>>> we have consensus to either close the issue without a change in the
>>> specification or if we have consensus to change the specification.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Steve
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> DiME mailing list
>>> DiME@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> DiME mailing list
> DiME@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email