IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Dime] DOIC #62 - Section 3 needs to be made consistent with DIOC solution

Jouni Korhonen <jouni.nospam@gmail.com> Wed, 16 July 2014 22:43 UTC

Return-Path: <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D985D1A038C for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Jul 2014 15:43:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Dl2QZUYcTTVf for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Jul 2014 15:43:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pa0-x233.google.com (mail-pa0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::233]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 914BC1A0382 for <dime@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Jul 2014 15:43:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pa0-f51.google.com with SMTP id ey11so2112039pad.38 for <dime@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Jul 2014 15:43:36 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=gE+lWunzXZsoJAys1Dc0iGv3WjiEcDNMWN1AsLO6VPM=; b=Q6CMt6XdcCWLqZCq/EVt4DRD+KndswXALqKs6Pi3MGn7WiV+/C/W8gaAez9BiGigo/ K6uAt5FJyaFa9P/NhowbAQc4qAp7Q/d490cK4DDx6U4PPAwubNh+AzEvb/mB34HMV//3 GN94Ry1z2yvAv6eXeCetLLOev5NfHijN26Q85leB8Q1IsgQEpv3N9LyLtFXSQjO0F/1s gz+d5zJ2labk7hKd8SReMy9KecaUYZjhoeSUQeWmF+LfJn2HjXCmhQ9QNn212GpPUVP/ uQ3YSXMXhom5mNB689U08FBlfNyvwinkbf2MygrFPRYF4PEDszct+Wcip8WIC5y4knR0 js3g==
X-Received: by 10.68.245.202 with SMTP id xq10mr24165233pbc.109.1405550616294; Wed, 16 Jul 2014 15:43:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.100.20.19] ([63.133.199.244]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id y12sm654142pdk.21.2014.07.16.15.43.34 for <dime@ietf.org> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 16 Jul 2014 15:43:35 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <53C70015.8010208@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2014 01:43:33 +0300
From: Jouni Korhonen <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dime@ietf.org
References: <53C67728.1040907@usdonovans.com> <AE25B9DB-8F17-4FBA-A6A2-0E9FCF484698@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <AE25B9DB-8F17-4FBA-A6A2-0E9FCF484698@nostrum.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dime/ywWLJCMyYgZEcQUjN3FSwY7_dpI
Subject: Re: [Dime] DOIC #62 - Section 3 needs to be made consistent with DIOC solution
X-BeenThere: dime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Diameter Maintanence and Extentions Working Group <dime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dime/>
List-Post: <mailto:dime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2014 22:43:38 -0000

Fine by me to close #62.

- Jouni

7/16/2014 5:17 PM, Ben Campbell kirjoitti:
> On Jul 16, 2014, at 7:59 AM, Steve Donovan <srdonovan@usdonovans.com> wrote:
>
>> All,
>>
>> One of the side effects of the restructuring of the DOIC specification was to align section 3 with the normative sections of the document.  Based on this, I propose that we close this issue.
>>
>> Any problems with the text in section 3 of -03 should be dealt with as new problem reports and should propose specific wording changes.
>>
>> In addition, we need to make sure that any changes to the normative sections get reflected in the informative text in section 3.
>>
>> If there are no objections then I will close the issue.
>>
>
> No objection here.
>
> _______________________________________________
> DiME mailing list
> DiME@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email