[Dime] DOIC #62 - Section 3 needs to be made consistent with DIOC solution
Steve Donovan <srdonovan@usdonovans.com> Wed, 16 July 2014 12:59 UTC
Return-Path: <srdonovan@usdonovans.com>
X-Original-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 989D31B2A4A for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Jul 2014 05:59:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.579
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.579 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NxGB47MIP-Yw for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Jul 2014 05:59:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from biz131.inmotionhosting.com (biz131.inmotionhosting.com [66.117.4.208]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 421041B2A08 for <dime@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Jul 2014 05:59:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [41.0.92.142] (port=51744 helo=Steves-MacBook-Air-2.local) by biz131.inmotionhosting.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <srdonovan@usdonovans.com>) id 1X7Onq-0000JW-PB for dime@ietf.org; Wed, 16 Jul 2014 05:59:23 -0700
Message-ID: <53C67728.1040907@usdonovans.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2014 14:59:20 +0200
From: Steve Donovan <srdonovan@usdonovans.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "dime@ietf.org" <dime@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-OutGoing-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - biz131.inmotionhosting.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - usdonovans.com
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: biz131.inmotionhosting.com: authenticated_id: srd+usdonovans.com/only user confirmed/virtual account not confirmed
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dime/k0ovCf7cGuUW-ppRsKZ45-odX_E
Subject: [Dime] DOIC #62 - Section 3 needs to be made consistent with DIOC solution
X-BeenThere: dime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Diameter Maintanence and Extentions Working Group <dime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dime/>
List-Post: <mailto:dime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2014 12:59:25 -0000
All, One of the side effects of the restructuring of the DOIC specification was to align section 3 with the normative sections of the document. Based on this, I propose that we close this issue. Any problems with the text in section 3 of -03 should be dealt with as new problem reports and should propose specific wording changes. In addition, we need to make sure that any changes to the normative sections get reflected in the informative text in section 3. If there are no objections then I will close the issue. Regards, Steve
- [Dime] DOIC #62 - Section 3 needs to be made cons… Steve Donovan
- Re: [Dime] DOIC #62 - Section 3 needs to be made … Ben Campbell
- Re: [Dime] DOIC #62 - Section 3 needs to be made … Jouni Korhonen