Re: [Dime] issue #56 proposed conclusion
"Wiehe, Ulrich (NSN - DE/Munich)" <ulrich.wiehe@nsn.com> Tue, 25 March 2014 09:08 UTC
Return-Path: <ulrich.wiehe@nsn.com>
X-Original-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B8031A0386 for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Mar 2014 02:08:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ynrTgWXzPOIM for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Mar 2014 02:08:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from demumfd001.nsn-inter.net (demumfd001.nsn-inter.net [93.183.12.32]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 810C11A0369 for <dime@ietf.org>; Tue, 25 Mar 2014 02:08:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from demuprx017.emea.nsn-intra.net ([10.150.129.56]) by demumfd001.nsn-inter.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id s2P98XWD009099 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 25 Mar 2014 09:08:33 GMT
Received: from DEMUHTC002.nsn-intra.net ([10.159.42.33]) by demuprx017.emea.nsn-intra.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id s2P98Wid018777 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Tue, 25 Mar 2014 10:08:33 +0100
Received: from DEMUHTC009.nsn-intra.net (10.159.42.40) by DEMUHTC002.nsn-intra.net (10.159.42.33) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.123.3; Tue, 25 Mar 2014 10:08:32 +0100
Received: from DEMUMBX014.nsn-intra.net ([169.254.14.91]) by DEMUHTC009.nsn-intra.net ([10.159.42.40]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Tue, 25 Mar 2014 10:08:32 +0100
From: "Wiehe, Ulrich (NSN - DE/Munich)" <ulrich.wiehe@nsn.com>
To: ext Steve Donovan <srdonovan@usdonovans.com>, "dime@ietf.org" <dime@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Dime] issue #56 proposed conclusion
Thread-Index: Ac9EPXt5r7PuIO0xQGuIoXMHDH01dgDR2ZtAAAG7ogAAH3vzQA==
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 09:08:32 +0000
Message-ID: <5BCBA1FC2B7F0B4C9D935572D9000668151D206F@DEMUMBX014.nsn-intra.net>
References: <5BCBA1FC2B7F0B4C9D935572D9000668151D1F0A@DEMUMBX014.nsn-intra.net> <53308244.5010305@usdonovans.com>
In-Reply-To: <53308244.5010305@usdonovans.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.159.42.112]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_5BCBA1FC2B7F0B4C9D935572D9000668151D206FDEMUMBX014nsnin_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-purgate-type: clean
X-purgate-Ad: Categorized by eleven eXpurgate (R) http://www.eleven.de
X-purgate: clean
X-purgate: This mail is considered clean (visit http://www.eleven.de for further information)
X-purgate-size: 18072
X-purgate-ID: 151667::1395738513-0000128C-CD52107C/0/0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dime/9oskfDzFWVTcq_boZfYSgtAhPRU
Subject: Re: [Dime] issue #56 proposed conclusion
X-BeenThere: dime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Diameter Maintanence and Extentions Working Group <dime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dime/>
List-Post: <mailto:dime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 09:08:41 -0000
Also fine with me. Ulrich From: DiME [mailto:dime-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of ext Steve Donovan Sent: Monday, March 24, 2014 8:07 PM To: dime@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Dime] issue #56 proposed conclusion Ulrich, Acronym overlap is unavoidable. If we add OCS in the abbreviations section then we should be ok. Steve On 3/24/14 12:23 PM, Wiehe, Ulrich (NSN - DE/Munich) wrote: Dear all, I have received a further comment asking not to abbreviate "Overload Control State" as OCS is used for "Online Charging System". I'm fine with not abbreviating "Overload Control State". I shall close issue #56 to meet Steve's deadline for the 02-draft, unless I receive more comments by tomorrow. Ulrich -----Original Message----- From: Wiehe, Ulrich (NSN - DE/Munich) Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2014 2:08 PM To: dime@ietf.org<mailto:dime@ietf.org> Subject: issue #56 proposed conclusion #56: Bad Description of Overload Control State Dear all, I have received comments from Steve, MCruz and Jouni. I believe all comments are covered by the following proposed text: 5.5.1. Overload Control State (OCS) 5.5.1.1 Overload Control States for reacting nodes A reacting node maintains per supported Diameter application - a host-type Overload Control State for each Destination-Host towards which it sends host-type requests and - a realm-type Overload Control State for each Destination-Realm towards which it sends realm-type requests. A host-type Overload Control State may be identified by the pair of Application-Id and Destination-Host. A realm-type Overload Control State may be identified by the pair of Application-Id and Destination-Realm. The host-type/realm-type Overload Control State for a given pair of Application and Destination-Host / Destination-Realm could include the following information: - Sequence number (as reveived in OC-OLR) - Time of expiry (deviated from validity duration as received in OC-OLR and time of reception) - Selected Abatement Algorithm (as received in OC-Supported-Features) - Algorithm specific input data (as received within OC-OLR, e.g. Reduction Percentage for Loss) 5.5.1.2 Overload Control States for reporting nodes A reporting node maintains per supported Diameter application and per supported (and eventually selected) Abatement Algorithm an Overload Control State. An Overload Control State may be identified by the pair of Application-Id and supported Abatement Algorithm. The Overload Control State for a given pair of Application and Abatement Algorithm could include the information: - Sequence number - Validity Duration and Expiry Time - Algorithm specific input data (e.g. Reduction Percentage for Loss) 5.5.1.3 Maintaining Overload Control States Reacting nodes create a host-type OCS identified by OCS-Id = (app-id,host-id) when receiving an answer message of application app-id containing an Orig-Host of host-id and a host-type OC-OLR AVP unless such host-type OCS already exists. Reacting nodes create a realm-type OCS identified by OCS-Id = (app-id,realm-id) when receiving an answer message of application app-id containing an Orig-Realm of realm-id and a realm-type OC-OLR AVP unless such realm type OCS already exists. Reacting nodes delete an OCS when it expires (i.e. when current time minus reception time is greater than validity duration). Reacting nodes update the host-type OCS identified by OCS-Id = (app-id,host-id) when receiving an answer message of application app-id containing an Orig-Host of host-id and a host-type OC-OLR AVP with a sequence number higher than the stored sequence number. Reacting nodes update the realm-type OCS identified by OCS-Id = (app-id,realm-id) when receiving an answer message of application app-id containing an Orig-Realm of realm-id and a realm-type OC-OLR AVP with a sequence number higher than the stored sequence number. Reporting nodes create an OCS identified by OCS-Id = (app-id,Alg) when receiving a request of application app-id containing an OC-Supported-Features AVP indicating support of the Abatement Algorithm Alg (which the reporting node selects) while being overloaded, unless such OCS already exists. Reporting nodes delete an OCS when it expires. Reporting nodes update the OCS identified by OCS-Id = (app-id,Alg) when they detect the need to modify the requested amount of application app-id traffic reduction. Ulrich _______________________________________________ DiME mailing list DiME@ietf.org<mailto:DiME@ietf.org> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime
- [Dime] issue #56 proposed conclusion Wiehe, Ulrich (NSN - DE/Munich)
- Re: [Dime] issue #56 proposed conclusion Wiehe, Ulrich (NSN - DE/Munich)
- Re: [Dime] issue #56 proposed conclusion TROTTIN, JEAN-JACQUES (JEAN-JACQUES)
- Re: [Dime] issue #56 proposed conclusion TROTTIN, JEAN-JACQUES (JEAN-JACQUES)
- Re: [Dime] issue #56 proposed conclusion Steve Donovan
- Re: [Dime] issue #56 proposed conclusion Steve Donovan
- Re: [Dime] issue #56 proposed conclusion Wiehe, Ulrich (NSN - DE/Munich)
- Re: [Dime] issue #56 proposed conclusion Wiehe, Ulrich (NSN - DE/Munich)
- Re: [Dime] issue #56 proposed conclusion Wiehe, Ulrich (NSN - DE/Munich)
- Re: [Dime] issue #56 proposed conclusion Wiehe, Ulrich (NSN - DE/Munich)
- Re: [Dime] issue #56 proposed conclusion TROTTIN, JEAN-JACQUES (JEAN-JACQUES)
- Re: [Dime] issue #56 proposed conclusion Steve Donovan
- Re: [Dime] issue #56 proposed conclusion Steve Donovan
- Re: [Dime] issue #56 proposed conclusion Steve Donovan
- Re: [Dime] issue #56 proposed conclusion TROTTIN, JEAN-JACQUES (JEAN-JACQUES)
- Re: [Dime] issue #56 proposed conclusion TROTTIN, JEAN-JACQUES (JEAN-JACQUES)
- Re: [Dime] issue #56 proposed conclusion Wiehe, Ulrich (NSN - DE/Munich)
- Re: [Dime] issue #56 proposed conclusion TROTTIN, JEAN-JACQUES (JEAN-JACQUES)
- Re: [Dime] issue #56 proposed conclusion Steve Donovan
- Re: [Dime] issue #56 proposed conclusion Steve Donovan
- Re: [Dime] issue #56 proposed conclusion Steve Donovan
- Re: [Dime] issue #56 proposed conclusion TROTTIN, JEAN-JACQUES (JEAN-JACQUES)
- Re: [Dime] issue #56 proposed conclusion Steve Donovan
- Re: [Dime] issue #56 proposed conclusion TROTTIN, JEAN-JACQUES (JEAN-JACQUES)
- Re: [Dime] issue #56 proposed conclusion Steve Donovan