Re: [Dime] issue #56 proposed conclusion

Steve Donovan <srdonovan@usdonovans.com> Tue, 25 March 2014 21:11 UTC

Return-Path: <srdonovan@usdonovans.com>
X-Original-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED4611A0207 for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Mar 2014 14:11:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.12
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.12 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wHn2Xlw6KbJs for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Mar 2014 14:11:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from biz131.inmotionhosting.com (biz131.inmotionhosting.com [23.235.209.16]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C5C81A00BE for <dime@ietf.org>; Tue, 25 Mar 2014 14:11:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cpe-76-187-100-94.tx.res.rr.com ([76.187.100.94]:60417 helo=SDmac.local) by biz131.inmotionhosting.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <srdonovan@usdonovans.com>) id 1WSYd9-0003sk-5j; Tue, 25 Mar 2014 14:11:33 -0700
Message-ID: <5331F103.6050006@usdonovans.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 16:11:31 -0500
From: Steve Donovan <srdonovan@usdonovans.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Wiehe, Ulrich (NSN - DE/Munich)" <ulrich.wiehe@nsn.com>, "dime@ietf.org" <dime@ietf.org>
References: <5BCBA1FC2B7F0B4C9D935572D9000668151D1F0A@DEMUMBX014.nsn-intra.net> <53308244.5010305@usdonovans.com> <5BCBA1FC2B7F0B4C9D935572D9000668151D206F@DEMUMBX014.nsn-intra.net>
In-Reply-To: <5BCBA1FC2B7F0B4C9D935572D9000668151D206F@DEMUMBX014.nsn-intra.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------060702020707080409090407"
X-OutGoing-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - biz131.inmotionhosting.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - usdonovans.com
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: biz131.inmotionhosting.com: authenticated_id: srdonovan@usdonovans.com
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dime/YYjIPbMcu4uT-9q-qhXguaBdsk4
Subject: Re: [Dime] issue #56 proposed conclusion
X-BeenThere: dime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Diameter Maintanence and Extentions Working Group <dime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dime/>
List-Post: <mailto:dime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 21:11:38 -0000

All,

I plan to incorporate Ulrich's text in the -02 draft.

Ulrich, can you please copy the proposed text into the issue and close
the ticket.

Thanks,

Steve

On 3/25/14 4:08 AM, Wiehe, Ulrich (NSN - DE/Munich) wrote:
>
> Also fine with me.
>
> Ulrich
>
>  
>
> *From:*DiME [mailto:dime-bounces@ietf.org] *On Behalf Of *ext Steve
> Donovan
> *Sent:* Monday, March 24, 2014 8:07 PM
> *To:* dime@ietf.org
> *Subject:* Re: [Dime] issue #56 proposed conclusion
>
>  
>
> Ulrich,
>
> Acronym overlap is unavoidable.  If we add OCS in the abbreviations
> section then we should be ok.
>
> Steve
>
> On 3/24/14 12:23 PM, Wiehe, Ulrich (NSN - DE/Munich) wrote:
>
>     Dear all,
>
>      
>
>     I have received a further comment asking not to abbreviate "Overload Control State" as OCS is used for "Online Charging System".
>
>      
>
>     I'm fine with not abbreviating "Overload Control State".
>
>      
>
>     I shall close issue #56 to meet Steve's deadline for the 02-draft, unless I receive more comments by tomorrow.
>
>      
>
>     Ulrich
>
>      
>
>     -----Original Message-----
>
>     From: Wiehe, Ulrich (NSN - DE/Munich) 
>
>     Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2014 2:08 PM
>
>     To: dime@ietf.org <mailto:dime@ietf.org>
>
>     Subject: issue #56 proposed conclusion
>
>      
>
>     #56: Bad Description of Overload Control State
>
>      
>
>      
>
>     Dear all,
>
>      
>
>     I have received comments from Steve, MCruz and Jouni.
>
>      
>
>     I believe all comments are covered by the following proposed text:
>
>      
>
>      
>
>      
>
>         5.5.1.  Overload Control State (OCS)
>
>      
>
>         5.5.1.1   Overload Control States for reacting nodes
>
>      
>
>         A reacting node maintains per supported Diameter application
>
>         - a host-type Overload Control State for each Destination-Host towards
>
>           which it sends host-type requests and
>
>         - a realm-type Overload Control State for each Destination-Realm towards
>
>           which it sends realm-type requests.
>
>      
>
>         A host-type Overload Control State may be identified by the pair of
>
>         Application-Id and Destination-Host.
>
>         A realm-type Overload Control State may be identified by the pair of
>
>         Application-Id and Destination-Realm.
>
>         The host-type/realm-type Overload Control State for a given pair of
>
>         Application and Destination-Host / Destination-Realm could include the
>
>         following information:
>
>         - Sequence number (as reveived in OC-OLR)
>
>         - Time of expiry  (deviated from validity duration as received in OC-OLR
>
>           and time of reception)
>
>         - Selected Abatement Algorithm (as received in OC-Supported-Features)
>
>         - Algorithm specific input data (as received within OC-OLR, e.g.
>
>           Reduction Percentage for Loss)
>
>      
>
>        
>
>         5.5.1.2   Overload Control States for reporting nodes
>
>      
>
>         A reporting node maintains per supported Diameter application and per
>
>         supported (and eventually selected) Abatement Algorithm an Overload
>
>         Control State. 
>
>      
>
>         An Overload Control State may be identified by the pair of Application-Id
>
>         and supported Abatement Algorithm.
>
>      
>
>         The Overload Control State for a given pair of Application and Abatement
>
>         Algorithm could include the information:
>
>         - Sequence number
>
>         - Validity Duration and Expiry Time
>
>         - Algorithm specific input data (e.g. Reduction Percentage for Loss)
>
>      
>
>         
>
>         5.5.1.3  Maintaining Overload Control States
>
>      
>
>         Reacting nodes create a host-type OCS identified by OCS-Id = (app-id,host-id) when receiving
>
>         an answer message of application app-id containing an Orig-Host of host-id and a
>
>         host-type OC-OLR AVP unless such host-type OCS already exists.
>
>      
>
>         Reacting nodes create a realm-type OCS identified by OCS-Id = (app-id,realm-id) when receiving
>
>         an answer message of application app-id containing an Orig-Realm of realm-id and a
>
>         realm-type OC-OLR AVP unless such realm type OCS already exists.
>
>      
>
>         Reacting nodes delete an OCS when it expires (i.e. when current time
>
>         minus reception time is greater than validity duration).
>
>      
>
>         Reacting nodes update the host-type OCS identified by OCS-Id = (app-id,host-id) when
>
>         receiving an answer message of application app-id containing an Orig-Host of
>
>         host-id and a host-type OC-OLR AVP with a sequence number higher than the
>
>         stored sequence number.
>
>      
>
>         Reacting nodes update the realm-type OCS identified by OCS-Id = (app-id,realm-id) when
>
>         receiving an answer message of application app-id containing an Orig-Realm of
>
>         realm-id and a realm-type OC-OLR AVP with a sequence number higher than the
>
>         stored sequence number.
>
>      
>
>         Reporting nodes create an OCS identified by OCS-Id = (app-id,Alg) when receiving a
>
>         request of application app-id containing an OC-Supported-Features AVP
>
>         indicating support of the Abatement Algorithm Alg (which the reporting
>
>         node selects) while being overloaded, unless such OCS already exists.
>
>      
>
>         Reporting nodes delete an OCS when it expires.
>
>      
>
>         Reporting nodes update the OCS identified by OCS-Id = (app-id,Alg) when they detect the
>
>         need to modify the requested amount of application app-id traffic reduction.
>
>      
>
>     Ulrich
>
>      
>
>      
>
>     _______________________________________________
>
>     DiME mailing list
>
>     DiME@ietf.org <mailto:DiME@ietf.org>
>
>     https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime
>
>      
>
>  
>