[Dime] AD review of draft-ietf-dime-pmip6-02.txt
"Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com> Wed, 22 July 2009 11:27 UTC
Return-Path: <dromasca@avaya.com>
X-Original-To: dime@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dime@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73D703A6EE6 for <dime@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 04:27:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.169
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.169 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.430, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fC5KUyfYKyZr for <dime@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 04:27:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nj300815-nj-outbound.net.avaya.com (nj300815-nj-outbound.net.avaya.com [198.152.12.100]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90C5E3A6A90 for <dime@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 04:27:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.43,247,1246852800"; d="scan'208";a="167878953"
Received: from unknown (HELO co300216-co-erhwest.avaya.com) ([198.152.7.5]) by nj300815-nj-outbound.net.avaya.com with ESMTP; 22 Jul 2009 07:26:53 -0400
Received: from unknown (HELO 307622ANEX5.global.avaya.com) ([135.64.140.12]) by co300216-co-erhwest-out.avaya.com with ESMTP; 22 Jul 2009 07:26:53 -0400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2009 13:26:46 +0200
Message-ID: <EDC652A26FB23C4EB6384A4584434A0401892F66@307622ANEX5.global.avaya.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: AD review of draft-ietf-dime-pmip6-02.txt
thread-index: AcoKv0wzBD14oqc0Q9uJ14rHeyN8Ig==
From: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>
To: dime@ietf.org
Subject: [Dime] AD review of draft-ietf-dime-pmip6-02.txt
X-BeenThere: dime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Diameter Maintanence and Extentions Working Group <dime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dime>
List-Post: <mailto:dime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2009 11:27:23 -0000
Please find below the AD review of draft-ietf-dime-pmip6-02.txt. I believe that this I-D is stable and clear enough, and it can be submitted to IETF Last Call. Please consider the following comments together with the other IETF Last Call comments. 1. Section 4.8 describes the usage of the Service-Selection AVP and is normative as far as I understand. As this AVP is re-used from [I-D. ietf-dime-mip6-split] I believe that that I-D should be a normative reference rather than an informative reference. I do not see any problem with this, as [I-D. ietf-dime-mip6-split] is also aiming to be a PS and is ahead of this I-D, already in the RFC Editor queue. 2. Please expand DHCP at its first occurrence in the text. 3. Running id-nits results in a number of I-Ds having more recent versions, I guess the RFC Editor will catch those when the document will be in their hands. Regards, Dan
- [Dime] AD review of draft-ietf-dime-pmip6-02.txt Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
- Re: [Dime] AD review of draft-ietf-dime-pmip6-02.… jouni korhonen