Re: [Dime] AD review of draft-ietf-dime-pmip6-02.txt

jouni korhonen <jouni.nospam@gmail.com> Thu, 23 July 2009 11:21 UTC

Return-Path: <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dime@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dime@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 845543A69AF for <dime@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 04:21:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.486
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.486 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.113, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GOMqbQt7I0cx for <dime@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 04:21:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-fx0-f218.google.com (mail-fx0-f218.google.com [209.85.220.218]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 796833A685F for <dime@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 04:21:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by fxm18 with SMTP id 18so747972fxm.37 for <dime@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 04:21:32 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:cc:message-id:from:to :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :subject:date:references:x-mailer; bh=5t+3ViosmYE6dLUNq+WGyoSOOgK5m+G0wuJjIQDwE28=; b=mCzix8KawMjDPYEwtLtbVqBOHpslNYqDhqBCBeXLRDXOw8kYAlJidryIGbWAyHjEn8 xnA/pwzh3BFyAoier2pZY2VhlHNKk149GlZRGBnMqraf5vlcFrCKX27AO3uPAK3Mv2kq AbCXEwQfWBcsKmzYppl/utH26TzG+5t2evGDw=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=cc:message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:references :x-mailer; b=wL//KFAtRepoFs72KH0jKnV7kVzL1dKQ5BFkjZYzcxLOL99rQsg9QdU/y59W+6HXmj 4OkUYnisOBF/8inKRjzeLDkNlP9xo7CbWcPPnN7NgzRS0MT5W9HGlLQp+O6GKjn6tsJ2 zTqMB+qn+dezSQ7oh9UWsU9UZHIKKugQ32Phs=
Received: by 10.204.53.141 with SMTP id m13mr1909766bkg.11.1248341839706; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 02:37:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from a88-112-140-13.elisa-laajakaista.fi (a88-112-140-13.elisa-laajakaista.fi [88.112.140.13]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id b17sm2356311fka.6.2009.07.23.02.37.18 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 23 Jul 2009 02:37:19 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <C7C4AAE1-FC54-4B5F-A6CD-EAE199B07884@gmail.com>
From: jouni korhonen <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>
To: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>
In-Reply-To: <EDC652A26FB23C4EB6384A4584434A0401892F66@307622ANEX5.global.avaya.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"; delsp="yes"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v935.3)
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 12:37:17 +0300
References: <EDC652A26FB23C4EB6384A4584434A0401892F66@307622ANEX5.global.avaya.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.935.3)
Cc: dime@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Dime] AD review of draft-ietf-dime-pmip6-02.txt
X-BeenThere: dime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Diameter Maintanence and Extentions Working Group <dime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dime>
List-Post: <mailto:dime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 11:21:44 -0000

Thanks Dan again for the review and progressing the I-D.

On Jul 22, 2009, at 2:26 PM, Romascanu, Dan (Dan) wrote:

> Please find below the AD review of draft-ietf-dime-pmip6-02.txt. I
> believe that this I-D is stable and clear enough, and it can be
> submitted to IETF Last Call. Please consider the following comments
> together with the other IETF Last Call comments.
>
> 1. Section 4.8 describes the usage of the Service-Selection AVP and is
> normative as far as I understand. As this AVP is re-used from [I-D.
> ietf-dime-mip6-split] I believe that that I-D should be a normative
> reference rather than an informative reference. I do not see any  
> problem
> with this, as [I-D. ietf-dime-mip6-split] is also aiming to be a PS  
> and
> is ahead of this I-D, already in the RFC Editor queue.

Fine with me (don't know why it actually was informative in the first  
place). We'll change this.


>
> 2. Please expand DHCP at its first occurrence in the text.

Ack.


>
> 3. Running id-nits results in a number of I-Ds having more recent
> versions, I guess the RFC Editor will catch those when the document  
> will
> be in their hands.

Ack.


Cheers,
	Jouni


>
> Regards,
>
> Dan
>
> _______________________________________________
> DiME mailing list
> DiME@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime