Re: [Dime] DIME Charter Update
"Glen Zorn" <gwz@net-zen.net> Mon, 08 June 2009 07:12 UTC
Return-Path: <gwz@net-zen.net>
X-Original-To: dime@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dime@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 340963A6889 for <dime@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Jun 2009 00:12:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.619
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.619 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.980, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET=1.96]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1SCjNrBsWEAr for <dime@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Jun 2009 00:12:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpout08.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net (smtpout08-01.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net [64.202.165.119]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 5FBB13A67A1 for <dime@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Jun 2009 00:12:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 22993 invoked from network); 8 Jun 2009 07:12:45 -0000
Received: from unknown (124.121.211.14) by smtpout08.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net (64.202.165.119) with ESMTP; 08 Jun 2009 07:12:44 -0000
From: Glen Zorn <gwz@net-zen.net>
To: 'jouni korhonen' <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>, "'Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo)'" <hannes.tschofenig@nsn.com>
References: <3D3C75174CB95F42AD6BCC56E5555B450168506E@FIESEXC015.nsn-intra.net> <4F72CB70-846C-474A-9B3C-C1ED6083766B@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4F72CB70-846C-474A-9B3C-C1ED6083766B@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2009 14:09:27 +0700
Organization: Network Zen
Message-ID: <003c01c9e808$1284b840$378e28c0$@net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Thread-Index: AcnoBtlOCedSw0qKQLOkKc2cthucdwAAAGzw
Content-Language: en-us
Cc: iesg-secretary@ietf.org, dime@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Dime] DIME Charter Update
X-BeenThere: dime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Diameter Maintanence and Extentions Working Group <dime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dime>
List-Post: <mailto:dime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2009 07:12:42 -0000
jouni korhonen [mailto://jouni.nospam@gmail.com] writes: ... > > The IETF has completed work on the Diameter Base protocol and is > > working on revising the base protocol specification. There is on- > going > > work on defining RADIUS extensions and the DIME WG will ensure > > that work done in RADEXT is also available for Diameter. The mandating of forward as well as backward compatibility with RADIUS is an _extremely_ bad idea, IMHO. It may be harmless currently, since the probability of useful extensions to RADIUS being produced by the RADIUS Extensions WG appears to be close to zero, but it sets a bad precedent. ... > > Goals and Milestones: > > > > [snip] > > Should we add draft-korhonen-dime-mip6-feature-bits-00.txt to charter > (that contains the extracted parts from mip6-split I-D due identified > IPRs). Even if this draft is trivial and will be informational, having > it as a WG item would be nice.. or? Given the history of the IETF, it would be nice only if you really want to slow the progress of the draft; otherwise, if it really is both trivial & informational, why not submit it directly to the RFC Editor & be done w/it? ...
- [Dime] DIME Charter Update Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo)
- Re: [Dime] DIME Charter Update jouni korhonen
- Re: [Dime] DIME Charter Update Glen Zorn
- Re: [Dime] DIME Charter Update jouni korhonen