Re: [Dime] WGLC for draft-ietf-dime-extended-naptr

Shouldn't the title actually be something like "Diameter S-NAPTR Usage"?

Change the first page header to read 

Network Working Group                                           M. Jones
Internet-Draft                                                  Bridgewater
Systems

instead of 

Diameter Maintenance and                                        M. Jones
Extensions (DIME)                                               Bridgewater
Systems

The abbreviated title ("dime-extended-naptr") is just silly (and not
anything like an abbreviation).

There is no Application Service Tag define for the Diameter Base Protocol in
this draft (although there is in rfc388bis).  Since The Diameter Base
protocol includes rudimentary accounting functionality it doesn't seem
completely unreasonable that Diameter Base might be used as a stand-alone
app.

Hope this helps.

 ~gwz

> -----Original Message-----
> From: dime-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:dime-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> Jouni
> Sent: Saturday, January 08, 2011 5:51 AM
> To: dime@ietf.org
> Cc: dime-chairs@tools.ietf.org
> Subject: [Dime] WGLC for draft-ietf-dime-extended-naptr
> 
> Folks,
> 
> We will rerun a short WGLC for draft-ietf-dime-extended-naptr-04 since
> there were some bigger restructuring on the document. The WGLC starts as
> of today 8th Jan 2011 and ends 14th Jan 2011 23:59 CET+1. If you have
> substantial technical comments, please post them to the list. Purely
> editorial comments can be mailed directly to the authors. Silence will
> be taken as acceptance.
> 
> - Jouni (as a Dime co-chair)
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> DiME mailing list
> DiME@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime